Birdie: Natural Language-Driven Table Discovery Using Differentiable Search Index
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Natural language (NL)-driven table discovery identifies relevant tables from large table repositories based on NL queries. While current deep-learning-based methods using the traditional dense vector search pipeline, i.e., representation-index-search, achieve remarkable accuracy, they face several limitations that impede further performance improvements: (i) the errors accumulated during the table representation and indexing phases affect the subsequent search accuracy; and (ii) insufficient query-table interaction hinders effective semantic alignment, impeding accuracy improvements. In this paper, we propose a novel framework Birdie, using a differentiable search index. It unifies the indexing and search into a single encoder-decoder language model, thus getting rid of error accumulations. Birdie first assigns each table a prefix-aware identifier and leverages a large language model-based query generator to create synthetic queries for each table. It then encodes the mapping between synthetic queries/tables and their corresponding table identifiers into the parameters of an encoder-decoder language model, enabling deep query-table interactions. During search, the trained model directly generates table identifiers for a given query. To accommodate the continual indexing of dynamic tables, we introduce an index update strategy via parameter isolation, which mitigates the issue of catastrophic forgetting. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Birdie outperforms state-of-the-art dense methods by 16.8% in accuracy, and reduces forgetting by over 90% compared to other continual learning approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2026Can LLMs Clean Up Your Mess? A Survey of Application-Ready Data Preparation with LLMscited by 9
- 2025Empowering Tabular Data Preparation with Language Models: Why and How?cited by 4
- 2026FollowTable: A Benchmark for Instruction-Following Table Retrievalcited by 0
- 2026Stellar: Scalable Multimodal Document Retrieval for Natural Language Queriescited by 0
- 2026Open Tabular Insight Extraction: Where Do We Stand, and Where Should We Go?cited by 0
- 2026Open Tabular Insight Extraction: Where Do We Stand, and Where Should We Go?7 Sep 2026
- 2026Stellar: Scalable Multimodal Document Retrieval for Natural Language Queries18 Jun 2026
- 2026FollowTable: A Benchmark for Instruction-Following Table Retrieval1 May 2026
- 2026Can LLMs Clean Up Your Mess? A Survey of Application-Ready Data Preparation with LLMs22 Jan 2026
- 2025Empowering Tabular Data Preparation with Language Models: Why and How?3 Aug 2025