mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

When Semantically Consistent Encoding Meets View-Label Heterogeneity Modeling: A Unified Framework for Incomplete Multi-View Multi-Label Learning

arXiv 2609.07525 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Incomplete multi-view multi-label learning requires not only robust semantic aggregation from partially observed views, but also label-aware exploitation of view-specific evidence. Existing approaches usually emphasize either shared representation learning or decision-level fusion. The former improves robustness against missing views, yet tends to compress label-discriminative view-specific cues into a single latent representation. The latter preserves individual view predictions, but often relies on fixed or globally learned fusion weights, ignoring that different labels of different instances may require different views. To address these limitations, this paper presents V2L, a unified representation-decision framework for incomplete multi-view multi-label classification. On the representation side, V2L constructs semantically consistent variational posteriors from incomplete views through a perturbation-aware encoding mechanism, which provides a stable shared semantic basis. On the decision side, V2L introduces an active view-label relevance modeling strategy that estimates instance-wise and label-wise view contributions, allowing each label prediction to adaptively select useful view-specific evidence. From the perspective of model architecture, these two important strategies are integrated into a unified framework through a hybrid fusion architecture, simultaneously meeting the requirements of cross-view semantic consistency and representational complementarity. Extensive experiments under both incomplete and complete settings show that V2L achieves leading performance on five benchmarks. Code is available at: https://github.com/justsmart/V2L.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2026.

Builds on

18 of 67 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Emergence of Invariance and Disentanglement in Deep Representationscited by 213
  2. 2020Learning Robust Representations via Multi-View Information Bottleneckcited by 189
  3. 2022Trusted Multi-View Classification with Dynamic Evidential Fusioncited by 167
  4. 2016A Survey of Multi-View Representation Learningcited by 107
  5. 2017Multi-Label Learning with Global and Local Label Correlationcited by 39
  6. 2022Large Loss Matters in Weakly Supervised Multi-Label Classificationcited by 38
  7. 2022A Survey on Incomplete Multi-view Clusteringcited by 31
  8. 2022One Positive Label is Sufficient: Single-Positive Multi-Label Learning with Label Enhancementcited by 22
  9. 2020A Concise yet Effective model for Non-Aligned Incomplete Multi-view and Missing Multi-label Learningcited by 19
  10. 2023DICNet: Deep Instance-Level Contrastive Network for Double Incomplete Multi-View Multi-Label Classificationcited by 13
  11. 2023Exploring and Exploiting Uncertainty for Incomplete Multi-View Classificationcited by 13
  12. 2024Dynamic Correlation Learning and Regularization for Multi-Label Confidence Calibrationcited by 13
6 more
  1. 2023Reliable Representation Learning for Incomplete Multi-View Missing Multi-Label Classificationcited by 12
  2. 2020Expand Globally, Shrink Locally: Discriminant Multi-label Learning with Missing Labelscited by 9
  3. 2022An Effective Approach for Multi-label Classification with Missing Labelscited by 5
  4. 2025Incomplete Multi-view Clustering via Hierarchical Semantic Alignment and Cooperative Completioncited by 5
  5. 2022Variational Distillation for Multi-View Learningcited by 3
  6. 2024Open-world Multi-label Text Classification with Extremely Weak Supervisioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.