Weakly-supervised Kidney Tumor Classification from CT Scans with Multi-Instance Learning and Anatomical Filtering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning models for CT scan analysis are often limited by the scarcity of precise pixel-level annotations, which require significant radiologist effort to produce. Training on scan-level labels alone reduces annotation requirements but introduces challenges: low supervision ratios and large input volumes make models prone to overfitting and shortcut learning. In this work, we investigate two complementary methods to address these challenges: multi-instance learning (MIL) and anatomical filtering. MIL divides CT volumes into 2D slice instances, enabling efficient 2D architectures with ImageNet pretraining rather than computationally demanding 3D models. Anatomical filtering uses Compass, our self-supervised body part regression model, to crop scans to pathology-relevant subregions without requiring segmentation masks. We evaluate two MIL frameworks - Attention-based MIL (ABMIL) and FocusMIL - on kidney tumor classification across one internal dataset (TUH) and two external datasets (KiTS23 and TCGA-KiRC). Our best models achieve F1 = 0.83 on the internal test set using only scan-level labels. We further show that anatomical filtering with the Compass model is critical for the out-of-distribution generalization of embedding-based ABMIL, while instance-based FocusMIL demonstrates greater inherent robustness to distribution shift. While evaluated on kidney tumors, we consider this a proof-of-concept for a broader weakly supervised CT classification pipeline applicable to other organs and pathologies.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2026.
Builds on
17 of 37 references.
References · 17
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2018Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 1,095
- 2019The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)cited by 509
- 2022MONAI: An open-source framework for deep learning in healthcarecited by 448
- 2019Med3D: Transfer Learning for 3D Medical Image Analysiscited by 288
- 2020A review of deep learning in medical imaging: Imaging traits, technology trends, case studies with progress highlights, and future promisescited by 231
- 2016Revisiting Multiple Instance Neural Networkscited by 119
- 2023The KiTS21 Challenge: Automatic segmentation of kidneys, renal tumors, and renal cysts in corticomedullary-phase CTcited by 103
- 2023Interventional Bag Multi-Instance Learning On Whole-Slide Pathological Imagescited by 91
- 2020Contrastive Learning of Relative Position Regression for One-Shot Object Localization in 3D Medical Imagescited by 17
- 2025PanTS: The Pancreatic Tumor Segmentation Datasetcited by 16
5 more
- 2020Synergistic Learning of Lung Lobe Segmentation and Hierarchical Multi-Instance Classification for Automated Severity Assessment of COVID-19 in CT Imagescited by 13
- 2021Learning Multi-Site Harmonization of Magnetic Resonance Images Without Traveling Human Phantomscited by 12
- 2023Reproducibility in Multiple Instance Learning: A Case For Algorithmic Unit Testscited by 11
- 2024From Correlation to Causation: Max-Pooling-Based Multi-Instance Learning Leads to More Robust Whole Slide Image Classificationcited by 7
- 2024Anatomical Positional Embeddingscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.