mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Human-agent discovery of reconfigurable in-plane ferroelectric superdomain control

arXiv 2609.06887 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2026cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated experimentation is most effective when the observables, available actions, and objective are defined before the experiment starts, as is the case for Bayesian optimization. However, in many exploratory experiments, the variables that describe the sample must be extracted from the data, new operations emerge during the experiments, and the instrument budget is too small to learn the problem by trials. Here we introduce the Scanning Probe Agentic Research Cycle (SPARC) framework, in which a coding agent and a human operator share one microscope, one notebook, and two persistent memory files. FINDINGS.md stores graded conclusions about the experiment, whereas PITFALLS.md records learned failure modes of analysis and instrument. We apply SPARC to reconfigure the in-plane superdomain direction of a (111)-oriented PbZr0.2Ti0.8O3 film. In an operator-supervised campaign, the agent reanalyzed earlier manual measurements and developed an oriented lattice of stationary bias pulses with alternating polarity to reconfigure the superdomain direction. In a subsequent agent-controlled campaign, PITFALLS.md entries were compiled into checks that validate a design before any write. The experiments showed that spatial polarity alternation, instead of the exact matching between the lattice and lamellar periods, determines directional selection. Combining a raster scan with a masked pulse lattice printed the letters UTK into the superdomain orientation. The campaign also identified practical requirements for agentic experimentation where physical verification of instrument execution, the conditions under which stored findings remain valid, validation of new observables on instrument data, and robust control protocols.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2026.

Builds on

3 of 15 references.

References · 3

  1. 2024Synergizing Human Expertise and AI Efficiency with Language Model for Microscopy Operation and Automated Experiment Designcited by 9
  2. 2024Bayesian Co-navigation: Dynamic Designing of the Materials Digital Twins via Active Learningcited by 5
  3. 2025Rewards-based image analysis in microscopycited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026MatClaw: An Autonomous Code-First LLM Agent for End-to-End Materials Exploration
  2. 2026Autonomous Materials Exploration by Integrating Automated Phase Identification and AI-Assisted Human Reasoning
  3. 2026Symmetry- and Property-Aware Crystal Generation with Reinforcement Learning for Inverse Materials Design
  4. 2026Hypothesis-Driven Autonomous Materials Synthesis with Multimodal LLM Agents
  5. 2026Evaluating a 4B open-weights local LLM for agentic DFT workflows: a literature reproducibility audit
  6. 2026From Phase Prediction to Phase Design: A ReAct Agent Framework for High-Entropy Alloy Discovery
  7. 2026Crystal-structure design by agentic AI in a language of motifs
  8. 2026Agentic Fusion of Large Atomic and Language Models to Accelerate Superconductor Discovery