mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From Phase Prediction to Phase Design: A ReAct Agent Framework for High-Entropy Alloy Discovery

arXiv 2603.11068 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2026cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Discovering high-entropy alloy (HEA) compositions that reliably form a target crystal phase is a high-dimensional inverse design problem that conventional trial-and-error experimentation and forward-only machine learning models cannot efficiently solve. Here we present a ReAct (Reasoning + Acting) LLM agent that autonomously proposes, validates, and iteratively refines HEA compositions by querying a calibrated XGBoost surrogate trained on 4,753 experimental records across four phases (FCC, BCC, BCC+FCC, BCC+IM), achieving 94.66% accuracy (F1 macro = 0.896). Against Bayesian optimisation (BO) and random search baselines, the full-prompt agent achieves descriptor-space rediscovery rates of 38%, 18%, and 38% for FCC, BCC, and BCC+FCC (Mann--Whitney p ≤ 0.039), with proposals lying 2.4--22.8× closer to the experimental phase manifold than random search. An ablation reveals that domain priors shift the agent from landmark-alloy recall toward compositionally diverse exploration -- an uninformed agent scores higher rediscovery by concentrating on literature-dense families, while the full-prompt agent explores underrepresented space (unique ratio 1.0 vs. 0.39 for BCC+FCC). These regimes represent distinct criteria: proximity to known literature versus genuine discovery. Spearman analysis confirms agent reasoning is statistically aligned with empirical phase distributions (ρ = 0.736, p = 0.004 for BCC). This work establishes LLM-guided agentic reasoning as a principled, transparent, and manifold-aware complement to gradient-free optimisation for inverse alloy design.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2026.

Builds on

7 of 48 references.

References · 7

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  3. 202314 Examples of How LLMs Can Transform Materials Science and Chemistry: A Reflection on a Large Language Model Hackathoncited by 86
  4. 2025LARC: Towards Human-level Constrained Retrosynthesis Planning through an Agentic Frameworkcited by 9
  5. 2026Artificial Intelligence in Materials Science and Engineering: Current Landscape, Key Challenges, and Future Trajectoriecited by 5
  6. 2026ChemNavigator: Agentic AI Discovery of Design Rules for Organic Photocatalystscited by 2
  7. 2026Escaping the Hydrolysis Trap: An Agentic Workflow for Inverse Design of Durable Photocatalytic Covalent Organic Frameworkscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026SVGym (SciVerseGym): An Environment for Reinforcement Learning and Bayesian Optimization in Crystal Discovery
  2. 2024Rapid and Automated Alloy Design with Graph Neural Network-Powered LLM-Driven Multi-Agent Systems
  3. 2025Autonomous Inorganic Materials Discovery via Multi-Agent Physics-Aware Scientific Reasoning
  4. 2026Towards Automated Discovery: A Review of Generative Models, Multimodal Learning and Closed-Loop Workflows in Inverse Materials Design
  5. 2026Optimizing Expert-Designed Crystal Graph Networks for Band-Gap Prediction with an Autonomous LLM Research Loop
  6. 2025CrystalGym: A New Benchmark for Materials Discovery Using Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2026Autonomous Materials Exploration by Integrating Automated Phase Identification and AI-Assisted Human Reasoning
  8. 2026Crystal-structure design by agentic AI in a language of motifs