Disparity Has a Sign: Stereo Matching Beyond the Zero-Disparity Plane
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern stereo matching models fail when disparity crosses zero, with end-point error (EPE) rising by 4.6-37×. Yet stereoscopic content, from cinema 3D to VR, routinely contains objects behind the zero-disparity plane (ZDP), corresponding to negative disparities. The blind spot cascades through datasets, architectures, and evaluation protocols, all of which inherit the non-negative geometry. Rectified parallel cameras place ZDP at infinity, so every finite depth yields d=fB/z ≥ 0 by construction, and nothing within the standard pipeline can violate, or even measure, a negative disparity. To measure it, we propose textitZDPShift, a benchmark of 21,495 stereo pairs from seven cinematographer-authored open movies, each frame rendered at five zero-disparity-plane positions with dense signed ground truth. Six state-of-the-art image and video stereo matching models collapse once the plane moves. On identical scene content, FoundationStereo goes from 2.24 px EPE to 75.33px, with every backbone leaving roughly half of all pixels exceeding a three-pixel disparity error. What is missing, however, is not the underlying matching capability. % The capability itself, however, is already present. Training on supervision synthesized from SceneFlow, which adds no new data or parameters, keeps the error flat across the signed range. Training only the decoder, with the pretrained matching features frozen, performs comparably across all six backbones, with EPE jittering within 0.2px. Thus, the pretrained features already extend to the negative regime they were never trained on, and only the output convention discarded it. Meanwhile, positive-regime accuracy on KITTI, Middlebury, ETH3D, and Sintel is largely preserved.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2026.
Builds on
22 of 36 references.
References · 22
- 2023DUSt3R: Geometric 3D Vision Made Easycited by 1,567
- 2025VGGT: Visual Geometry Grounded Transformercited by 1,539
- 2024Grounding Image Matching in 3D with MASt3Rcited by 983
- 2015A Large Dataset to Train Convolutional Networks for Disparity, Optical Flow, and Scene Flow Estimationcited by 881
- 2023Argoverse 2: Next Generation Datasets for Self-Driving Perception and Forecastingcited by 707
- 2018Pyramid Stereo Matching Networkcited by 489
- 2020Virtual KITTI 2cited by 353
- 2021RAFT-Stereo: Multilevel Recurrent Field Transforms for Stereo Matchingcited by 353
- 2019Group-wise Correlation Stereo Networkcited by 235
- 2020AANet: Adaptive Aggregation Network for Efficient Stereo Matchingcited by 202
- 2022Practical Stereo Matching via Cascaded Recurrent Network with Adaptive Correlationcited by 197
- 2023Iterative Geometry Encoding Volume for Stereo Matchingcited by 190
10 more
- 2025FoundationStereo: Zero-Shot Stereo Matchingcited by 173
- 2023Spring: A High-Resolution High-Detail Dataset and Benchmark for Scene Flow, Optical Flow and Stereocited by 172
- 2023DynamicStereo: Consistent Dynamic Depth from Stereo Videoscited by 148
- 2021SMD-Nets: Stereo Mixture Density Networkscited by 120
- 2025MEt3R: Measuring Multi-View Consistency in Generated Imagescited by 95
- 2018Falling Things: A Synthetic Dataset for 3D Object Detection and Pose Estimationcited by 92
- 2019Web Stereo Video Supervision for Depth Prediction from Dynamic Scenescited by 73
- 2024StereoCrafter: Diffusion-based Generation of Long and High-fidelity Stereoscopic 3D from Monocular Videoscited by 37
- 2024Match-Stereo-Videos: Bidirectional Alignment for Consistent Dynamic Stereo Matchingcited by 24
- 2025Stereo Any Video: Temporally Consistent Stereo Matchingcited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.