mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Geometry-Aware Test-Time Learning for Quantitative Spatial Reasoning

arXiv 2609.06004 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Quantitative spatial reasoning in visual-language models (VLMs) aims to infer spatial distances and directional relationships among objects in 3D space from a 2D image and a natural language query. Despite recent progress, VLM spatial reasoning remains brittle under distribution shifts, largely due to the high cost of 3D supervision. As a result, models often produce inconsistent or contradictory predictions when faced with novel object configurations or rephrased spatial queries, revealing a misalignment between learned representations and underlying geometry. To address this, we propose TTL-SR, a geometry-aware Test-Time Learning framework for quantitative Spatial Reasoning that leverages geometric consistency constraints and unlabeled test data to adapt models to target domains. Specifically, TTL-SR augments the input query with geometrically coupled auxiliary queries, filters unreliable predictions via adaptive geometric triggering to construct structured token-level pseudo-labels, and updates model parameters under a geometry-aware multi-objective loss using only test data. Experimental results demonstrate that TTL-SR significantly boosts spatial reasoning performance, yielding 6.47% and 9.41% accuracy gains for Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct and SpatialRGPT-VILA-1.5-8B on Q-Spatial-ScanNet dataset, respectively.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 6 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2026.

Builds on

6 of 54 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025ViewSpatial-Bench: Evaluating Multi-perspective Spatial Localization in Vision-Language Models27 May
  2. 2025Cosmos-Reason1: From Physical Common Sense To Embodied Reasoning18 Mar

Other references · 4

  1. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  3. 2025Self-Improving LLM Agents at Test-Timecited by 30
  4. 2026Guided Trajectory Optimization with Sparse Scaling for Test-Time Diffusioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Make Geometry Matter for Spatial Reasoning
  2. 2024Reasoning Paths with Reference Objects Elicit Quantitative Spatial Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models
  3. 2024SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilities
  4. 2026SpatialSpeak: QA-Native Reconstruction with Local and Global Context for Spatial Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  5. 2025Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  6. 2026Reinforcing Dual-Path Reasoning in Spatial Vision Language Models
  7. 2026Self-Evolving Spatial Reasoning in Vision Language Models via Geometric Logic Consistency
  8. 2025DynaSolidGeo: A Dynamic Benchmark for Genuine Spatial Mathematical Reasoning of VLMs in Solid Geometry