AutoLR: Automating the Path from Research to Launch Review in Industrial Recommender Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Improving an industrial recommender is an iterative research-and-engineering process rather than a direct path from idea to deployment. In DASHEN, NetEase's gaming-community app, algorithm engineers typically identify promising directions from research papers, technical reports, and prior production experiments; reproduce or adapt the underlying methods; implement them in the production codebase; and evaluate the resulting models through training and offline experiments. Promising candidates are then advanced to online A/B tests, and those demonstrating robust gains are submitted to Launch Review---the internal gate for full-traffic rollout. Large language models (LLMs) can assist with individual stages of this workflow, but the overall process remains human-dependent without a harness that can reliably coordinate them across long-running, often multi-day experimental cycles. We present AutoLR, initially built as Auto Launch Review and later extended upstream into an autonomous research-to-launch harness. AutoLR combines three system mechanisms: a multi-expert council that debates and adversarially reviews proposals; a deterministic evidence-weighted exploration--exploitation selector that allocates a limited trial budget across candidate directions and uses Council reranking; and a layered knowledge system that combines external research, production-system knowledge, and DASHEN-specific domain knowledge---such as game communities, player characteristics, and content-interaction patterns---with posterior evidence from configurations, patches, logs, failures, and offline outcomes. LLM agents perform semantic reasoning and code generation, while deterministic controllers retain authority over execution, metric extraction, guardrails, and persistent state transitions.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2026.
Builds on
21 of 38 references.
References · 21
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
- 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,002
- 2025AlphaEvolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discoverycited by 763
- 2024MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineeringcited by 429
- 2021Accounting for Variance in Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 195
- 2019Are We Really Making Much Progress? A Worrying Analysis of Recent Neural Recommendation Approachescited by 181
- 2020Neural Collaborative Filtering vs. Matrix Factorization Revisitedcited by 123
- 2023Should we be going MAD? A Look at Multi-Agent Debate Strategies for LLMscited by 103
- 2017Reporting Score Distributions Makes a Difference: Performance Study of LSTM-networks for Sequence Taggingcited by 71
- 2015The Ladder: A Reliable Leaderboard for Machine Learning Competitionscited by 67
9 more
- 2020AutoFIS: Automatic Feature Interaction Selection in Factorization Models for Click-Through Rate Predictioncited by 52
- 2019Neural Input Search for Large Scale Recommendation Modelscited by 39
- 2015Always Valid Inference: Bringing Sequential Analysis to A/B Testingcited by 20
- 2026Self-Evolving Recommendation System: End-To-End Autonomous Model Optimization With LLM Agentscited by 19
- 2026AgentX: Towards Agent-Driven Self-Iteration of Industrial Recommender Systemscited by 8
- 2015On Online Control of False Discovery Ratecited by 6
- 2026AgenticRecTune: Multi-Agent with Self-Evolving Skillhub for Recommendation System Optimizationcited by 5
- 2026NOVA: A Verification-Aware Agent Harness for Architecture Evolution in Industrial Recommender Systemscited by 5
- 2026RecHarness: A Bandit-Routed Agentic Harness for Self-Evolving Recommender Systemscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Auto-RecSys: Harnessing Autonomous Research Agents for Industry-Scale Recommender System
- 2026AutoResearch at Production Scale: Failure Modes and a Multi-Agent Framework
- 2026AutoRecLab: Describe the Experiment, Get the Code!
- 2026RecSys Factory: Bounding LLM Agent Autonomy to Decision Points in the Industrial Recommender Lifecycle
- 2026AURA: Agentic Diagnosis and Refinement for Production Recommender Systems at Scale
- 2026DREAM Technical Report ↗
- 2026CORAL: An LLM-Native Harness for Production Recommender Systems
- 2026RecEvolve: A Knowledge-Driven Autonomous Agent System for Recommender Systems