RecSys Factory: Bounding LLM Agent Autonomy to Decision Points in the Industrial Recommender Lifecycle
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agentic recommender systems
Abstract (arXiv)
Deploying LLM agents into industrial recommender operations exposes a three-way tension we frame as the autonomy-determinism-efficiency trilemma: general autonomy (interpreting operator intent, generating glue code zero-shot), industrial determinism (schema-conforming feature extraction, non-crashing A/B, zero compliance-path hallucination), and end-to-end efficiency. Any two can be maximized against the third. We present RecSys Factory, an LLM-agent platform deployed for 78 days across three heterogeneous Tencent recommender business lines. The design principle is autonomy at decision points, not over pipelines, made concrete through three deconstructions that each discharge one vertex of the trilemma. Runtime is deconstructed into three host-emitted event sources (Claude Code Stop hooks, corporate-IM webhooks, workflow scheduler APIs): the platform carries no long-running daemon during the wait phase and consumes zero CPU during the 94% of wall-clock spent waiting on Spark or GPU jobs. Capability is deconstructed into a 29-file skill ecosystem (8,971 lines of SKILL.md) whose per-skill pitfall tables mechanically compile into a 400-entry PitfallStore, confining autonomy to bounded typed decision surfaces inside pre-committed pipelines. Deployment spans three business lines with disjoint label semantics, A/B layer topologies, and operator personas; an onboarding-time compression is observed on two of the three and is reported as a case-study observation, not a generalization claim, and not measured against a controlled pre-platform baseline. The human is retained at the diagnostic-versus-execution boundary via a human-in-the-loop card protocol, deployed as an audit-trail primitive (schema-validated, idempotent, replayable) and reported from an 8-day 16-run pilot. Across the 78-day window the platform recorded 1,624 CLI-tool dispatches at a 78.6% aggregate success rate.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agentic recommender systems, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 5 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2026.
Builds on
5 of 18 references.
References · 5
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
- 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agentscited by 956
- 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Developmentcited by 893
- 2022Monolith: Real Time Recommendation System With Collisionless Embedding Tablecited by 30
- 2021Persia: An Open, Hybrid System Scaling Deep Learning-based Recommenders up to 100 Trillion Parameterscited by 17
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Auto-RecSys: Harnessing Autonomous Research Agents for Industry-Scale Recommender System
- 2026NOVA: A Verification-Aware Agent Harness for Architecture Evolution in Industrial Recommender Systems
- 2026AURA: Agentic Diagnosis and Refinement for Production Recommender Systems at Scale
- 2026Rethinking Recommendation Paradigms: From Pipelines to Agentic Recommender Systems
- 2026DREAM Technical Report ↗
- 2026AutoLR: Automating the Path from Research to Launch Review in Industrial Recommender Systems
- 2026CORAL: An LLM-Native Harness for Production Recommender Systems
- 2025Towards Agentic Recommender Systems in the Era of Multimodal Large Language Models