Recurrence Is Not Enough: Causally Validating Multilingual SAE Translation Features in Gemma 2 and 3
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → SAE features and their applications
Abstract (arXiv)
Sparse autoencoder (SAE) features are increasingly used to explain and steer language-model behavior, but it remains unclear whether a feature found in one language context plays the same causal role when processing prompts in another language. We study this question using translation-initiation features (Wu et al., 2026). We reproduce the SAE feature discovery method from Wu et al. in Gemma 2 and extend it to multilingual settings that vary prompt language, source language, and target language. We then test whether features that recur across settings affect translation behavior by amplifying or ablating their activations during inference. We also examine whether the method can be applied to Gemma 3. In both models, we observe an identical finding: although we can find more than 20 features that activate frequently across all discovery settings, causal validation shows that nearly all have small or inconsistent effects. In contrast, one feature -- Gemma 2's (L10, 5717) and Gemma 3's (L20, 2456) -- consistently improves COMET scores when amplified and degrades them when ablated across 23 language settings. These results show that feature recurrence can overstate cross-lingual transfer, while identifying a language-agnostic translation-initiation direction in Gemma 2 and Gemma 3.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in SAE features and their applications, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 14 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2026.
Builds on
14 of 20 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2026When the Coffee Feature Activates on Coffins: An Analysis of Feature Extraction and Steering for Mechanistic Interpretability6 Jan
- 2025Causal Language Control in Multilingual Transformers via Sparse Feature Steering17 Jul
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models15 Sep
Other references · 11
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,027
- 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,009
- 2016Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classificationcited by 872
- 2021XL-Sum: Large-Scale Multilingual Abstractive Summarization for 44 Languagescited by 346
- 2016FastText.zip: Compressing text classification modelscited by 333
- 2024Do Llamas Work in English? On the Latent Language of Multilingual Transformerscited by 280
- 2021An Interpretability Illusion for BERTcited by 95
- 2025WMT24++: Expanding the Language Coverage of WMT24 to 55 Languages & Dialectscited by 79
- 2025Do Multilingual LLMs Think In English?cited by 78
- 2025Large Language Models Share Representations of Latent Grammatical Concepts Across Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 57
- 2025Refusal Direction is Universal Across Safety-Aligned Languagescited by 37
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Finding the Translation Switch: Discovering and Exploiting the Task-Initiation Features in LLMs
- 2026Are Single-Token Sparse Autoencoder Features Causally Necessary? Layer-Depth and SAE-Family Effects
- 2025Unveiling Language-Specific Features in Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoders
- 2026Strengthening Target-Language Features: SAE-Based Steering for Multilingual Inference
- 2025Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probing
- 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretability
- 2026Multilingual Steering by Design: Multilingual Sparse Autoencoders and Principled Layer Selection
- 2026The Interlingua Hypothesis: LLMs Translate via a Latent Task-agnostic Feature Space