mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DODR: Deterministic Operator-Driven Reasoning in Latent Space

arXiv 2609.04782 ↗First posted 4 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Autoregressive (AR) large language models formulate reasoning as token-level probabilistic sampling, which induces three fundamental defects in complex logical reasoning: error accumulation, probability substituting necessity, and the linear-chain information bottleneck. This paper proposes the Deterministic Operator-Driven Reasoning in Latent Space architecture (DODR), which reconstructs reasoning as reasoning-graph computation in a high-dimensional linear-algebraic space. Reasoning states are represented as snapshot vectors whose primitives are semantic units (phrases or sentences) rather than tokens, and each inference step is a deterministic matrix operation with no token sampling. Peirce's three inference types are formalized as three trainable matrix operators: a rank-deficient deduction operator (information collapse), a full-rank induction operator (information expansion), and an abduction operator defined as the Moore-Penrose pseudo-inverse of deduction (information hypothesizing). We prove that the operator set is minimal and complete given Peirce's trichotomy, that no single "super-operator" can realize all three types (a rank obstruction), and that reasoning graphs are Turing-complete with contractive backflow converging by Banach's fixed-point theorem. Experiments on 503 sample records (420 deduplicated samples) across dedicated and end-to-end settings show: deduction loss converges to 1.40e-05; induction achieves 0.9996 generalization coverage with 20/20 hard vetoes on counterexamples; abduction solutions exceed the random baseline by 28x with judgment accuracies of 72.5% (58/80, Wilson 95% CI [61.9%, 81.1%]) and 81.7% (49/60, CI [70.1%, 89.4%]); frozen operators attain 100% (60/60) on unseen cross-domain deduction. The architecture provides a structural zero-hallucination guarantee and a three-layer continual-learning mechanism. All data and code are released.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2026.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023DetermLR: Augmenting LLM-based Logical Reasoning from Indeterminacy to Determinacy
  2. 2026Tyler: Typed Latent Reasoning for Language Models -- When to Think, What to Compute, and How Much to Allocate
  3. 2025Selection, Reflection and Self-Refinement: Revisit Reasoning Tasks via a Causal Lens
  4. 2026Efficient Reasoning via Constrained Optimization in Latent Space
  5. 2026Latent Memory Palace: Reasoning for Control as Autoregressive Variational Inference
  6. 2025Parallel Thinking, Sequential Answering: Bridging NAR and AR for Efficient Reasoning
  7. 2025From Chaos to Order: The Atomic Reasoner Framework for Fine-grained Reasoning in Large Language Models
  8. 2024On Probabilistic and Causal Reasoning with Summation Operators