From Chaos to Order: The Atomic Reasoner Framework for Fine-grained Reasoning in Large Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable progress, yet their capacity for logical ``slow-thinking'' reasoning persists as a critical research frontier. Current inference scaling paradigms suffer from two fundamental constraints: fragmented thought flows compromising logical coherence, and intensively computational complexity that escalates with search space dimensions. To overcome these limitations, we present Atomic Reasoner (AR), a cognitive inference strategy that enables fine-grained reasoning through systematic atomic-level operations. AR decomposes the reasoning process into atomic cognitive units, employing a cognitive routing mechanism to dynamically construct reasoning representations and orchestrate inference pathways. This systematic methodology implements stepwise, structured cognition, which ensures logical coherence while significantly reducing cognitive load, effectively simulating the cognitive patterns observed in human deep thinking processes. Extensive experimental results demonstrate AR's superior reasoning capabilities without the computational burden of exhaustive solution searches, particularly excelling in linguistic logic puzzles. These findings substantiate AR's effectiveness in enhancing LLMs' capacity for robust, long-sequence logical reasoning and deliberation.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 25 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2025.
Builds on
25 of 45 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 24
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
- 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,220
- 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMscited by 1,193
- 2024From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judgecited by 480
- 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervisioncited by 426
- 2024ReST-MCTS*: LLM Self-Training via Process Reward Guided Tree Searchcited by 338
- 2025rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinkingcited by 308
- 2024Fine-Tuning Large Vision-Language Models as Decision-Making Agents via Reinforcement Learningcited by 158
12 more
- 2024Marco-o1: Towards Open Reasoning Models for Open-Ended Solutionscited by 142
- 2023Let's reward step by step: Step-Level reward model as the Navigators for Reasoningcited by 96
- 2024LLaMA-Berry: Pairwise Optimization for O1-like Olympiad-Level Mathematical Reasoningcited by 90
- 2024On Designing Effective RL Reward at Training Time for LLM Reasoningcited by 87
- 2024o1-Coder: an o1 Replication for Codingcited by 77
- 2024A Comparative Study on Reasoning Patterns of OpenAI's o1 Modelcited by 62
- 2024Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Reward-guided Tree Searchcited by 58
- 2024When is Tree Search Useful for LLM Planning? It Depends on the Discriminatorcited by 46
- 2024MindStar: Enhancing Math Reasoning in Pre-trained LLMs at Inference Timecited by 40
- 2025Rethinking External Slow-Thinking: From Snowball Errors to Probability of Correct Reasoningcited by 36
- 2024Uni-RLHF: Universal Platform and Benchmark Suite for Reinforcement Learning with Diverse Human Feedbackcited by 20
- 2024Enhancing Robotic Manipulation with AI Feedback from Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2025Efficient Reasoning Models: A Surveycited by 93
- 2025DualRAG: A Dual-Process Approach to Integrate Reasoning and Retrieval for Multi-Hop Question Answeringcited by 20
- 2025Squeeze the Soaked Sponge: Efficient Off-policy Reinforcement Finetuning for Large Language Modelcited by 14
- 2025Key Decision-Makers in Multi-Agent Debates: Who Holds the Power?cited by 3
- 2026Towards Compositional Generalization in LLMs for Smart Contract Security: A Case Study on Reentrancy Vulnerabilitiescited by 0
- 2026Towards Compositional Generalization in LLMs for Smart Contract Security: A Case Study on Reentrancy Vulnerabilities11 Jan 2026
- 2025Key Decision-Makers in Multi-Agent Debates: Who Holds the Power?14 Nov 2025
- 2025Squeeze the Soaked Sponge: Efficient Off-policy Reinforcement Finetuning for Large Language Model9 Jul 2025
- 2025DualRAG: A Dual-Process Approach to Integrate Reasoning and Retrieval for Multi-Hop Question Answering25 Apr 2025
- 2025Efficient Reasoning Models: A Survey15 Apr 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Towards a Mechanistic Understanding of Propositional Logical Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2025Atom of Thoughts for Markov LLM Test-Time Scaling
- 2023Concise and Organized Perception Facilitates Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2025Advancing Reasoning in Large Language Models: Promising Methods and Approaches
- 2025Harnessing the Reasoning Economy: A Survey of Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models
- 2024The Role of Deductive and Inductive Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2024RATT: A Thought Structure for Coherent and Correct LLM Reasoning
- 2024LogicAsker: Evaluating and Improving the Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models