Beneath the Surface of Chains-of-Thought: A Mechanistic Interpretation of Reasoning Operations in LLMs
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Reasoning in large language models unfolds through diverse functional operations, such as problem formulation, goal decomposition, and deduction. Although these operations are explicitly distinguished in text, little is known about how they are geometrically organized in representation spaces. To this end, we investigate whether distinct reasoning operations exhibit corresponding geometric structure in hidden representations. We find that operations are separable in held-out representations, with separability peaking in middle layers, and verify that this structure is not explained by lexical or positional confounds. Across layers, token-wise operation-alignment becomes more distributed over spans, while identical surface tokens are represented differently depending on the operation of its surrounding chunk. Attention-masking interventions further show that operation-aligned representations at chunk onset depend on preceding reasoning context. Consequently, our work demonstrates that language models maintain representational correspondence between linguistic reasoning expressions and their internal geometric structures. Code and project materials are available at https://github.com/naver-ai/beneath-cot.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 15 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2026.
Builds on
15 of 33 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2026ReasoningFlow: Discourse Structures for Understanding LLM Reasoning Traces3 Jun
- 2025Cognitive Foundations for Reasoning and Their Manifestation in LLMs20 Nov
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Report14 May
- 2025From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Models24 Feb
- 2025Towards Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Reinforced Reasoning with Large Language Models16 Jan
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models6 Oct
Other references · 9
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2025Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRscited by 377
- 2026Gemma 4 Technical Reportcited by 259
- 2025Thought Anchors: Which LLM Reasoning Steps Matter?cited by 129
- 2024On the Origins of Linear Representations in Large Language Modelscited by 79
- 2025Understanding and Steering the Cognitive Behaviors of Reasoning Models at Test-Timecited by 10
- 2026Cognitive Episodes in LLM Reasoning Traces Enable Interpretable Human Item Difficulty Predictioncited by 2
- 2026ReasoningLens: Hierarchical Visualization and Diagnostic Auditing for Large Reasoning Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025The Geometry of Reasoning: Flowing Logics in Representation Space
- 2026Unveiling the Reasoning Process of Large Language Models
- 2026Convergence Without Understanding: When Language Models Agree on Representations but Disagree on Reasoning
- 2026Emergent Manifold Separability during Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2026The Lattice Representation Hypothesis of Large Language Models
- 2026The Geometry of Thought: How Scale Restructures Reasoning In Large Language Models
- 2025Out-of-Context Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2026LLM Reasoning as Trajectories: Step-Specific Representation Geometry and Correctness Signals