mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Data Fusion Framework for Grounding Aerospace Surrogate Model via Experimental Wind-Tunnel Observations

arXiv 2609.04267 ↗First posted 2 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Aerodynamic surrogate models trained on high-fidelity CFD data reproduce numerical predictions of both scalar outputs and entire fields accurately, yet their predictive fidelity is limited by systematic discrepancies between CFD and experimental observations. We present an experimentally grounded correction framework that adapts a CFD-trained deep learning surrogate using wind-tunnel PSP measurements. A Geotransolver surrogate trained on 2,300 high-fidelity CFD simulations of the NASA CRM wing-body configuration, spanning geometric variation, Mach 0.70-0.85, and angles of attack 0 to 4 degrees, reproduces the CFD integrated aerodynamic forces and pitching moment to R2 > 0.99 but does not match the experimental data. To incorporate experimental information without retraining the surrogate, a correction network is trained on spatially registered PSP measurements at two freestream Mach numbers (0.70 and 0.85) across the same angle-of-attack range, learning the discrepancy between the surrogate-predicted and experimentally measured surface-pressure distributions. At Mach 0.85 the correction substantially improves agreement with PSP, particularly at the wing suction peak, shock location, and subsequent pressure recovery, reducing both the magnitude of the prediction error and the fraction of wetted surface on which it exceeds 0.05 in Cp, and it does so from a limited experimental dataset without modifying the pretrained surrogate parameters. On held-out angles of attack the grounded surrogate agrees with measurement to within 2.3-2.7% of the measured Cp range, and outperforms direct interpolation between the measured conditions at every state tested. Experimental measurements can therefore ground a large-scale simulation-trained surrogate by learning systematic CFD-to-experiment discrepancies while preserving its generalization capability and computational efficiency.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2026.

Builds on

6 of 24 references.

References · 6

  1. 2021Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equationscited by 527
  2. 2017Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part I): Data-driven Solutions of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 373
  3. 2018Survey of multifidelity methods in uncertainty propagation, inference, and optimizationcited by 142
  4. 2025DoMINO: A Decomposable Multi-scale Iterative Neural Operator for Modeling Large Scale Engineering Simulationscited by 27
  5. 2025GeoTransolver: Learning Physics on Irregular Domains Using Multi-scale Geometry Aware Physics Attention Transformercited by 23
  6. 2026Surrogates for Physics-based and Data-driven Modelling of Parametric Systems: Review and New Perspectivescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.