A Reverse Sign Language Dictionary: Open-Vocabulary Sign Recognition from Continuous Signing via Video Captioning and Description Retrieval
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Isolated Sign Language Recognition (ISLR) is conventionally cast as closed-set classification over gloss labels, which cannot generalize to signs unseen in training and ties every deployment to a gloss-annotated lexicon. We instead recognize signs extracted from continuous signing by (1) captioning a sign-level clip into a free-form procedural description of the articulation with an open-weight vision-language model, and (2) retrieving the closest entry from a vocabulary of target descriptions with a multilingual sentence encoder: a reverse sign language dictionary that needs no gloss supervision and admits an open vocabulary. On 1,300 sign-level segments from a Japanese Sign Language (JSL) dialogue corpus annotated with procedural descriptions (against a 2% top-10 chance floor over the 503-entry target vocabulary), fine-tuning the captioner substantially improves seen-class retrieval: language and vision tower fine-tuning raises top-10 retrieval on seen classes from 4.5% (untrained) to 49%, becoming statistically indistinguishable from a standard supervised closed-set classifier (I3D) on two of the three test sets where a closed-set classifier can be evaluated at all. More importantly, unseen-class retrieval also improves significantly over the untrained pipeline (11.5% -> 21.0% top-10, p=0.0094), a regime in which the closed-set classifier cannot participate. A matcher-side empirical upper-bound analysis shows the sentence encoder already recovers close to 100% of paraphrased gold descriptions, locating a gap in captioning quality that we aim to address in future work. To our knowledge this is the first description-based, open-vocabulary sign lookup from continuous signing without gloss supervision, and the first for JSL.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2026.
Builds on
11 of 13 references.
References · 11
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,270
- 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,834
- 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,464
- 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,073
- 2019Word-level Deep Sign Language Recognition from Video: A New Large-scale Dataset and Methods Comparisoncited by 218
- 2020BSL-1K: Scaling up co-articulated sign language recognition using mouthing cuescited by 106
- 2020Watch, read and lookup: learning to spot signs from multiple supervisorscited by 35
- 2023ASL Citizen: A Community-Sourced Dataset for Advancing Isolated Sign Language Recognitioncited by 34
- 2024SignCLIP: Connecting Text and Sign Language by Contrastive Learningcited by 20
- 2022Towards Zero-shot Sign Language Recognitioncited by 13
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Sign Language Recognition in the Age of LLMs
- 2026Towards Continuous Sign Language Conversation from Isolated Signs
- 2024Improving Continuous Sign Language Recognition with Adapted Image Models
- 2026Bootstrapping Sign Language Annotations with Sign Language Models
- 2025Generative Sign-description Prompts with Multi-positive Contrastive Learning for Sign Language Recognition
- 2026State Space Models are Effective Sign Language Learners: Exploiting Phonological Compositionality for Vocabulary-Scale Recognition
- 2025Seeing, Signing, and Saying: A Vision-Language Model-Assisted Pipeline for Sign Language Data Acquisition and Curation from Social Media
- 2024LLMs are Good Sign Language Translators