Spectral characteristics of autoencoder parameters as a vector representation of data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper examines the relationship between the parameters of autoencoder models and the statistical properties of the data on which they are trained. Autoencoders are defined as models with an encoder-decoder architecture, trained to reconstruct input data through a compressed latent representation. It is proposed that the model parameters can be viewed as a dense vector representation of the corresponding sample. To test this hypothesis, a theoretical and experimental study is conducted in which a vector representation is formed based on the spectral characteristics of the autoencoder parameter matrices. Theoretical analysis shows that the singular values of the model parameter matrices are related to the eigenvalues of the covariance matrix of the training data, ensuring the transfer of information between the data space and the parameter space. Experimental results on the CIFAR-10 and FashionMNIST datasets confirm that the resulting vector representations allow for a high degree of accuracy in distinguishing between models trained on different data subsets, without resorting to complex vector generation algorithms or using the original samples. These results suggest that the parameters of trained autoencoders can be viewed as sample representations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2026.
Builds on
17 of 32 references.
References · 17
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
- 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,076
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2020InterFaceGAN: Interpreting the Disentangled Face Representation Learned by GANscited by 393
- 2023A Survey on Deep Neural Network Pruning-Taxonomy, Comparison, Analysis, and Recommendationscited by 200
- 2016Information Dropout: Learning Optimal Representations Through Noisy Computationcited by 131
- 2023Similarity of Neural Network Models: A Survey of Functional and Representational Measurescited by 128
- 2020On Linear Identifiability of Learned Representationscited by 103
- 2017Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 90
- 2022Hyper-Representations as Generative Models: Sampling Unseen Neural Network Weightscited by 63
5 more
- 2018Modular meta-learningcited by 51
- 2019Dataset2Vec: Learning Dataset Meta-Featurescited by 37
- 2022The dynamics of representation learning in shallow, non-linear autoencoderscited by 27
- 2024Encodings for Prediction-based Neural Architecture Searchcited by 9
- 2025DRESS: Disentangled Representation-based Self-Supervised Meta-Learning for Diverse Taskscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.