Exact Limits of Random Projections for Preserving Geometry: Distance Recovery, Nearest-Neighbor Rankings, and Covariance Shape in Gaussian Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Johnson-Lindenstrauss (JL) lemma guarantees that a random projection of n points to m=O(varepsilon-2log n) dimensions preserves pairwise squared distances within relative error varepsilon with high probability, and this dimension order is asymptotically optimal. In high dimensions, however, distances concentrate around a baseline while key geometric information lies in much smaller fluctuations. We show that the JL bound can therefore be uninformative about retained geometry: an independent Gaussian replacement map can satisfy it even though the replacement cloud is independent of the original data. We then ask how well any decoder can recover a feature f(D) of a squared distance D from a linear sketch. Under squared-error loss, the optimal decoder is conditional expectation, so recovery defines a linear operator whose singular values quantify feature recovery. For isotropic Gaussian data (Sigma=σ2 Id), we diagonalize this operator in closed form. For fixed k with m,d-m→∞, its kth singular value satisfies ℓk≈(m/ d)k/2. This yields three sharp consequences. A rank-m sketch retains at most an m/d fraction of the variance of any feature of one squared distance. If m→∞ and m/d→0, the expected Kendall correlation is frac2π√m/d(1+o(1)); for fixed q, nearest- neighbor agreement tends to 1/q. Yet one projection can satisfy the JL bound while mean Kendall correlation vanishes when log nll mll d. After removing scale, Haar-averaged retained covariance-shape information is (m/d)2. Thus JL distance preservation does not quantify the geometry available for comparison or inference.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2026.
Builds on
8 of 51 references.
References · 8
- 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,497
- 2022Matryoshka Representation Learningcited by 282
- 2018Products of Many Large Random Matrices and Gradients in Deep Neural Networkscited by 49
- 2016Optimality of the Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemmacited by 42
- 2015Random-projection ensemble classificationcited by 29
- 2013Experiments with Random Projectioncited by 27
- 2018On the Non-asymptotic and Sharp Lower Tail Bounds of Random Variablescited by 19
- 2015Fast k-Nearest Neighbour Search via Dynamic Continuous Indexingcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.