Hearing the Whispers: Black-Box Membership Inference Attacks on Finetuned TTS Models
On the map: LLM safety and security → Membership inference attacks
Abstract (arXiv)
Text-to-Speech (TTS) foundation models are increasingly fine-tuned on private datasets to synthesize highly personalized voices, introducing severe privacy risks by exposing both biometric identities and sensitive speech content. Existing black-box membership inference attacks (MIAs) follow a two-stage pipeline of query generation and representation engineering, both of which face unique challenges when adapted to TTS. For query generation, dual conditioning on synthesis text and reference speech creates a large and underexplored query design space with no established criterion for identifying an effective query. For representation engineering, the multi-level speech characteristics and temporal variability of speech make low-level representations and direct comparisons inadequate for capturing membership signals. To address these challenges, we present the first black-box MIA framework explicitly tailored to TTS models at both the speaker and record levels. For query generation, we characterize the feasible query space and establish two criteria, scorable extent and memorization elicitation, for evaluating five representative queries, identifying recitation as the strongest. For representation engineering, we obtain multi-level speech representations from embedding models and temporally align the generated and target audio for fine-grained comparison. Evaluations across three state-of-the-art TTS models (CosyVoice2, F5-TTS, and XTTS-v2) fine-tuned on two benchmark datasets (VCTK and British Dialect) reveal severe privacy leakage: speaker-level AUC remains above 0.80 and approaches 1.0 in the strongest settings, while record-level AUC ranges from 0.80 to 0.90 and remains effective even in challenging scenarios where both members and non-members are of the same speakers. We further identify speech characteristics associated with disproportionate vulnerability to memorization.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Membership inference attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 59 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2026.
Builds on
59 of 78 references.
Closest ancestors · 15
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Towards Black-Box Membership Inference Attack for Diffusion Models25 May
- 2024Membership Inference on Text-to-Image Diffusion Models via Conditional Likelihood Discrepancy23 May
- 2024Improving Membership Inference in ASR Model Auditing with Perturbed Loss Features2 May
- 2024Do Membership Inference Attacks Work on Large Language Models?12 Feb
- 2023Black-box Membership Inference Attacks against Fine-tuned Diffusion Models13 Dec
- 2023SLMIA-SR: Speaker-Level Membership Inference Attacks against Speaker Recognition Systems14 Sep
- 2023White-box Membership Inference Attacks against Diffusion Models11 Aug
- 2023An Efficient Membership Inference Attack for the Diffusion Model by Proximal Initialization26 May
- 2023Membership Inference Attacks against Diffusion Models7 Feb
- 2023Are Diffusion Models Vulnerable to Membership Inference Attacks?2 Feb
- 2023Membership Inference of Diffusion Models24 Jan
- 2022Membership Inference Attacks Against Text-to-image Generation Models3 Oct
3 more
Other references · 44
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
- 2021WavLM: Large-Scale Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Full Stack Speech Processingcited by 1,609
- 2017Natural TTS Synthesis by Conditioning WaveNet on Mel Spectrogram Predictionscited by 800
- 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 755
- 2023Neural Codec Language Models are Zero-Shot Text to Speech Synthesizerscited by 737
- 2023Extracting Training Data from Diffusion Modelscited by 723
- 2020ECAPA-TDNN: Emphasized Channel Attention, Propagation and Aggregation in TDNN Based Speaker Verificationcited by 606
- 2021Conditional Variational Autoencoder with Adversarial Learning for End-to-End Text-to-Speechcited by 555
- 2019Libri-Light: A Benchmark for ASR with Limited or No Supervisioncited by 462
- 2025Qwen3-Omni Technical Reportcited by 451
32 more
- 2023Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language Modelscited by 375
- 2023Voicebox: Text-Guided Multilingual Universal Speech Generation at Scalecited by 373
- 2024F5-TTS: A Fairytaler that Fakes Fluent and Faithful Speech with Flow Matchingcited by 353
- 2024CosyVoice: A Scalable Multilingual Zero-shot Text-to-speech Synthesizer based on Supervised Semantic Tokenscited by 323
- 2024CosyVoice 2: Scalable Streaming Speech Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 282
- 2023NaturalSpeech 2: Latent Diffusion Models are Natural and Zero-Shot Speech and Singing Synthesizerscited by 233
- 2024NaturalSpeech 3: Zero-Shot Speech Synthesis with Factorized Codec and Diffusion Modelscited by 222
- 2024Emilia: An Extensive, Multilingual, and Diverse Speech Dataset for Large-Scale Speech Generationcited by 200
- 2021Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 193
- 2021A Survey on Neural Speech Synthesiscited by 182
- 2024XTTS: a Massively Multilingual Zero-Shot Text-to-Speech Modelcited by 174
- 2024AnyV2V: A Tuning-Free Framework For Any Video-to-Video Editing Taskscited by 151
- 2024E2 TTS: Embarrassingly Easy Fully Non-Autoregressive Zero-Shot TTScited by 149
- 2023Privacy Auditing with One (1) Training Runcited by 119
- 2026Qwen3-TTS Technical Reportcited by 106
- 2024Mini-Omni2: Towards Open-source GPT-4o with Vision, Speech and Duplex Capabilitiescited by 104
- 2024Min-K%++: Improved Baseline for Detecting Pre-Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 102
- 2023LibriTTS-R: A Restored Multi-Speaker Text-to-Speech Corpuscited by 100
- 2021Large-scale Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning for Automatic Speaker Verificationcited by 71
- 2022SoK: Let the Privacy Games Begin! A Unified Treatment of Data Inference Privacy in Machine Learningcited by 47
- 2021The VoicePrivacy 2020 Challenge: Results and findingscited by 45
- 2022Revisiting Over-Smoothness in Text to Speechcited by 31
- 2024Towards Controllable Speech Synthesis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Systematic Surveycited by 22
- 2026OmniVoice: Towards Omnilingual Zero-Shot Text-to-Speech with Diffusion Language Modelscited by 22
- 2022Avocodo: Generative Adversarial Network for Artifact-free Vocodercited by 18
- 2022Content-Dependent Fine-Grained Speaker Embedding for Zero-Shot Speaker Adaptation in Text-to-Speech Synthesiscited by 10
- 2025Privacy Audit as Bits Transmission: (Im)possibilities for Audit by One Runcited by 10
- 2026The Third VoicePrivacy Challenge: Preserving Emotional Expressiveness and Linguistic Content in Voice Anonymizationcited by 8
- 2025ArtistAuditor: Auditing Artist Style Pirate in Text-to-Image Generation Modelscited by 5
- 2023Privacy in Speech Technologycited by 4
- 2025The First VoicePrivacy Attacker Challengecited by 4
- 2025Voice Cloning: Comprehensive Surveycited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.