mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ExBind: A Controlled Diagnostic Benchmark for Visual-to-Executable Correspondence

arXiv 2609.01344 ↗First posted 1 Sep 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal coding and editing systems must map a visible or semantic referent to the exact executable object that can be edited. A wrong reference may select a valid but incorrect DOM node, SVG element, graph endpoint, hierarchy member, or table cell, while final execution success alone does not reveal the source of the failure. ExBind isolates this visual-to-executable correspondence layer as a controlled diagnostic benchmark between semantic localization and action execution. It samples representation-independent latent binding instances and compiles them into SVG, DOM, canvas, tree, graph, and table cases with deterministic mappings to executable references. Models output only a strict reference; the evaluator maps predictions back to latent structure and scores structural constraints without requiring reasoning traces. The release contains a 250-case broad suite, a disjoint 240-case targeted suite, and 50 paired latent groups. Qwen2.5-VL-3B achieves 98.4% candidate validity but 76.4% exact accuracy, while Qwen3-VL-4B achieves 100.0% validity and 98.8% exact accuracy. In the targeted table suite, all Qwen2.5-VL-3B residual errors are valid correct-row/wrong-column selections. Candidate-order perturbations change case-level outcomes while preserving this error pattern. ExBind is designed for controlled diagnosis rather than population-scale ranking or end-to-end editing evaluation. Code and benchmark records are available at https://github.com/Daerwang2020/Exbind and https://huggingface.co/datasets/Ziqianwwww/ExBind.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2026.

Builds on

11 of 22 references.

References · 11

  1. 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,479
  2. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
  3. 2023Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Webcited by 1,242
  4. 2021MDETR -- Modulated Detection for End-to-End Multi-Modal Understandingcited by 819
  5. 2024SeeClick: Harnessing GUI Grounding for Advanced Visual GUI Agentscited by 567
  6. 2022Pix2Struct: Screenshot Parsing as Pretraining for Visual Language Understandingcited by 366
  7. 2024OmniParser for Pure Vision Based GUI Agentcited by 198
  8. 2024Ferret-UI: Grounded Mobile UI Understanding with Multimodal LLMscited by 176
  9. 2021WebSRC: A Dataset for Web-Based Structural Reading Comprehensioncited by 100
  10. 2024ScreenAI: A Vision-Language Model for UI and Infographics Understandingcited by 98
  11. 2025UI-Vision: A Desktop-centric GUI Benchmark for Visual Perception and Interactioncited by 77

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Beyond NL2Code: A Structured Survey of Multimodal Code Intelligence
  2. 2025VCode: a Multimodal Coding Benchmark with SVG as Symbolic Visual Representation
  3. 2026Paint What You See: Benchmarking Dexterous Visual Tool Use in Multimodal Agents
  4. 2026Omni-I2C: A Holistic Benchmark for High-Fidelity Image-to-Code Generation
  5. 2025ArtifactsBench: Bridging the Visual-Interactive Gap in LLM Code Generation Evaluation
  6. 2026VLM-in-Sandbox: Visual Workspaces for Agentic Visual Reasoning
  7. 2026VisualCoding: Learning Executable Skills for Reliable Visual Reasoning
  8. 2025CodeDance: A Dynamic Tool-integrated MLLM for Executable Visual Reasoning