mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dense Process Supervision for Search Agents via Fact Utility Estimation

arXiv 2609.00833 ↗First posted 1 Sep 2026cs.CL cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning (RL) for search agents typically relies on outcome rewards. However, it often fails to achieve effective credit assignment, due to the unclear value of intermediate steps. It is hard to separate their contributions from the final result. In this paper, we propose a dense process supervision method based on fact utility estimation, which models the reasoning process as the accumulation of discrete evidence facts. We first extract structured facts from raw observations and organize them into an explicit fact store. To support credit assignment, we then cluster semantically equivalent facts and infer the posterior utility of each fact cluster using Bayesian estimation over group rollouts. Finally, we convert the estimated fact utilities into dense step-level rewards to guide RL training. Experiments on seven single-hop and multi-hop QA benchmarks show that our method consistently outperforms existing baselines. Ablation studies validate clear relative improvements on multi-hop QA compared to outcome reward-only training.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2026.

Builds on

22 of 43 references.

References · 22

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  4. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  5. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  6. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
  7. 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 1,411
  8. 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,371
  9. 2020Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Stepscited by 1,259
  10. 2022Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 1,216
  11. 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,084
  12. 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,054
10 more
  1. 2025BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agentscited by 616
  2. 2025Group-in-Group Policy Optimization for LLM Agent Trainingcited by 442
  3. 2025MEM1: Learning to Synergize Memory and Reasoning for Efficient Long-Horizon Agentscited by 226
  4. 2025ZeroSearch: Incentivize the Search Capability of LLMs without Searchingcited by 203
  5. 2025WebDancer: Towards Autonomous Information Seeking Agencycited by 180
  6. 2025WebShaper: Agentically Data Synthesizing via Information-Seeking Formalizationcited by 118
  7. 2024MATHSENSEI: A Tool-Augmented Large Language Model for Mathematical Reasoningcited by 34
  8. 2025MemSearcher: Training LLMs to Reason, Search and Manage Memory via End-to-End Reinforcement Learningcited by 26
  9. 2025Mitigating Lost-in-Retrieval Problems in Retrieval Augmented Multi-Hop Question Answeringcited by 22
  10. 2025TURA: Tool-Augmented Unified Retrieval Agent for AI Searchcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026BiCAA: Bidirectional Credit Assignment for Search-Augmented Agent
  2. 2026Search-R2: Enhancing Search-Integrated Reasoning via Actor-Refiner Collaboration
  3. 2026OASES: Outcome-Aligned Search-Evaluation Co-Training for Agentic Search
  4. 2026SD-Search: On-Policy Hindsight Self-Distillation for Search-Augmented Reasoning
  5. 2026Verifiable Process Rewards for Agentic Reasoning
  6. 2026KARL: Knowledge Agents via Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2026Chaining the Evidence: Robust Reinforcement Learning for Deep Search Agents with Citation-Aware Rubric Rewards
  8. 2026Process Reward Agents for Steering Knowledge-Intensive Reasoning