Towards unsupervised representation learning for quantum data: quantum models with inference and generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With quantum sensors, simulators and networks emerging, a future of quantum technology may produce quantum states as data---that is, coherently rather than as classical measurement records---thus motivating the study of suitable quantum generalisations of modern machine learning, including the automated, unsupervised extraction of useful representations. Two ingredients are central to the latter: inference, mapping observations to latent representations, and generation, mapping latent states back to synthetic data. Both are related to each other and to joint distributions for training models by the chain-rule of classical probability theory. The fact that quantum states however lack such universal, standard factorisation property thus poses a challenge. Here we develop a conceptual and mathematical framework for unsupervised representation learning from quantum data. Models are joint quantum states over visible and latent systems; state-over-time maps provide a notion of factorisation into a marginal state and inference (generation) channel; models with inference (generation) are ambiguous states---states for which such factorisation obtains---subject to a further consistency condition on extended inference maps as data extension. These stipulations are restrictive: we show that non-trivial models must feature non-linear such maps to the extended space. For three representative state-over-time maps, we completely characterise the ambiguous states, uncovering a hierarchy tied to the positive-partial-transpose (PPT) criterion from entanglement theory. Notably, the Leifer-Spekkens construction supports inference and generation exactly for model classes of PPT states, thus allowing genuinely quantum visible-latent correlations. We also formulate quantum counterparts of exact and approximate inference training, explore weaker notions of data extension and sketch a future research programme.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 100 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.
Builds on
21 of 100 references.
References · 21
- 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
- 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,466
- 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,140
- 2019Self-supervised Visual Feature Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 656
- 2020A Survey on Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 553
- 2020A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learningcited by 270
- 2021Quantum advantage in learning from experimentscited by 186
- 2017Optimizing the Latent Space of Generative Networkscited by 157
- 2020Experimental Quantum Generative Adversarial Networks for Image Generationcited by 83
- 2019The Born Supremacy: Quantum Advantage and Training of an Ising Born Machinecited by 75
- 2021QNLP in Practice: Running Compositional Models of Meaning on a Quantum Computercited by 65
- 2019A synthetic approach to Markov kernels, conditional independence and theorems on sufficient statisticscited by 55
9 more
- 2017Disintegration and Bayesian Inversion via String Diagramscited by 32
- 2014Quantum Inference on Bayesian Networkscited by 19
- 2021Variational inference with a quantum computercited by 18
- 2019Machine learning for protein folding and dynamicscited by 15
- 2023Causal models in string diagramscited by 14
- 2017A Quantum Extension of Variational Bayes Inferencecited by 5
- 2025Quantum Generative Adversarial Autoencoders: Learning latent representations for quantum data generationcited by 3
- 2026Discovering quantum phenomena with Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 3
- 2025Fundamentals of quantum Boltzmann machine learning with visible and hidden unitscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.