mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Latent-Space No-Arbitrage Geometry of Generative Models for Implied Volatility Surfaces

arXiv 2609.00332 ↗First posted 31 Aug 2026q-fin.CP cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative models for implied volatility surfaces must produce outputs that satisfy static no-arbitrage constraints. We study these constraints in latent space. For a fixed generator, we assign each latent code a scalar margin determined by the no-arbitrage conditions of the generated surface. The codes with nonnegative margin form the admissible latent set. We establish conditions under which strictly admissible codes remain admissible under small perturbations and the boundary of the admissible set is characterized by zero margin. For regular boundary components, we formulate a level-set equation whose local dynamics are directed toward the zero-margin set. The analysis treats the generator as a map from latent variables to surfaces and is therefore not restricted to a particular architecture. It applies to variational autoencoders, generative adversarial networks, and other generative models with a deterministic realization map. Numerical tests recover known boundaries in analytic examples. Experiments with a variational autoencoder trained on Heston surfaces show that similar reconstruction errors can correspond to different admissible regions and that the latent prior may be concentrated inside such a region. The computed boundary can also be used to modify latent codes that generate violating surfaces.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.

Builds on

3 of 20 references.

References · 3

  1. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 4,053
  2. 2019Deep Smoothing of the Implied Volatility Surfacecited by 19
  3. 2021Arbitrage-Free Implied Volatility Surface Generation with Variational Autoencoderscited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.