mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning the Geometry of Admissible Hypotheses through Inductive Bias in Training Distributions

arXiv 2608.31028 ↗First posted 31 Aug 2026stat.ML cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Scientific discovery often requires reasoning over competing hypotheses that are consistent with experimental observations. For mixed-variable and combinatorial hypothesis spaces, however, constructing probabilistic representations remains challenging because both the active model components and their associated parameters are unknown. In this work, we present a framework for learning continuous latent representations of admissible partial differential equations (PDEs) by embedding a scientific inductive bias directly into the training distribution. Progressively richer structural principles (e.g., sparsity, logical dependencies, common PDE families, and physical admissibility) are used to generate a structured distribution of hypotheses from which a gated variational autoencoder learns a continuous latent manifold. Experimental results show that the resulting 11-dimensional representation accurately reconstructs a broad collection of representative PDEs, while exhibiting smooth geometric transitions both within and across equation families. Through an ablation study we further demonstrate that introducing scientific principles reduces both structural misclassifications of equation forms and parameter estimation errors when reconstructing a representative benchmark set of admissible partial differential equations. These results show that embedding a scientific inductive bias in the training distribution enables the learning of compact and geometrically meaningful hypothesis manifolds, providing a principled foundation for future inference over competing governing equations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.

Builds on

13 of 27 references.

References · 13

  1. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 4,053
  2. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 548
  3. 2017Grammar Variational Autoencodercited by 285
  4. 2020VAEM: a Deep Generative Model for Heterogeneous Mixed Type Datacited by 66
  5. 2018On the Convergence of the SINDy Algorithmcited by 49
  6. 2020Probabilistic Grammars for Equation Discoverycited by 36
  7. 2022Reduced order modeling of parametrized systems through autoencoders and SINDy approach: continuation of periodic solutionscited by 29
  8. 2024SINDy-RL: Interpretable and Efficient Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 26
  9. 2022Fundamental limits to learning closed-form mathematical models from datacited by 12
  10. 2025Grammar-based Ordinary Differential Equation Discoverycited by 6
  11. 2023Multiphysics discovery with moving boundaries using Ensemble SINDy and Peridynamic Differential Operatorcited by 3
  12. 2026Neuro-Symbolic ODE Discovery with Latent Grammar Flowcited by 2
1 more
  1. 2025Graph-Eq: Discovering Mathematical Equations using Graph Generative Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.