mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ReTrace: Rejected-Trajectory Conditioning for Speculative Decoding

arXiv 2608.29748 ↗First posted 30 Aug 2026cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: Efficient LLM inference and serving → Speculative decoding

Abstract (arXiv)

Speculative decoding accelerates autoregressive language model inference by having a lightweight draft model propose multiple candidate tokens, which are then verified in parallel by a larger target model. However, after the first rejection, standard prefix-based verification discards the remaining draft suffix, so the computation spent generating and verifying those positions does not contribute to decoding progress. Focusing on DFlash, we show that rejected positions in a rejected suffix may still align with the target continuation, indicating that the draft model can retain useful semantic and structural information despite local token-level errors. Motivated by this observation and inspired by conditional diffusion, we introduce ReTrace, a rejected-trajectory conditioning method that conditions each draft block on the rejected suffix from the previous round rather than generating it from fresh mask placeholders alone. ReTrace retains the hidden representations of the rejected suffixes, aligns them with the next draft block, refines them using target-aware correction signals from the same verification pass, and admits them into the drafter's input embeddings through gated residual fusion. Because rejected tokens are never committed and target-side verification remains unchanged, ReTrace preserves the lossless property of speculative decoding without requiring an additional model forward pass. Experiments with Qwen3 models across mathematical reasoning, code generation, and open-ended dialogue demonstrate that ReTrace consistently improves average acceptance length and end-to-end decoding speed over its DFlash backbone. By introducing cross-round conditioning without modifying within-round proposal generation, ReTrace is largely orthogonal to existing drafting improvements and might be combined with them for further gains.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Speculative decoding, one of 12 directions in Efficient LLM inference and serving. Builds on 21 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2026.

Builds on

21 of 24 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026DSpark: Confidence-Scheduled Speculative Decoding with Semi-Autoregressive Generation6 Jul
  2. 2026JetSpec: Breaking the Scaling Ceiling of Speculative Decoding with Parallel Tree Drafting16 Jun
  3. 2026Domino: Decoupling Causal Modeling from Autoregressive Drafting in Speculative Decoding28 May
  4. 2026DFlash: Block Diffusion for Flash Speculative Decoding5 Feb
  5. 2026Make Every Draft Count: Hidden State based Speculative Decoding2 Feb
  6. 2025EAGLE-3: Scaling up Inference Acceleration of Large Language Models via Training-Time Test3 Mar
  7. 2024PEARL: Parallel Speculative Decoding with Adaptive Draft Length13 Aug
  8. 2024EAGLE-2: Faster Inference of Language Models with Dynamic Draft Trees24 Jun
  9. 2024EAGLE: Speculative Sampling Requires Rethinking Feature Uncertainty26 Jan
  10. 2024Medusa: Simple LLM Inference Acceleration Framework with Multiple Decoding Heads19 Jan
  11. 2022Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decoding30 Nov

Other references · 10

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  5. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  6. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  7. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  8. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
  9. 2024Turning Trash into Treasure: Accelerating Inference of Large Language Models with Token Recyclingcited by 47
  10. 2024The Perfect Blend: Redefining RLHF with Mixture of Judgescited by 43

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026D^2SD: Accelerating Speculative Decoding with Dual Diffusion Draft Models
  2. 2026DARTree: Speculative Diffusion Decoding with Autoregressive Draft Trees
  3. 2025Draft, Verify, and Improve: Toward Training-Aware Speculative Decoding
  4. 2025Training-Free Loosely Speculative Decoding: Accepting Semantically Correct Drafts Beyond Exact Match
  5. 2026Carryover Drafting: Recycling Rejected States for Speculative Decoding
  6. 2026MARS: Unleashing the Power of Speculative Decoding via Margin-Aware Verification
  7. 2026Accepted Prefixes Are Not All You Need: A Negative Result on PEFT-Based Block-Diffusion Drafting
  8. 2025DiffuSpec: Unlocking Diffusion Language Models for Speculative Decoding