On the Plasticity Collapse in Continual Machine Unlearning
On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine unlearning enables deep neural networks to selectively remove the influence of specific data in response to privacy and regulatory requirements. While prior work largely studies single-shot unlearning, real-world systems must accommodate continual unlearning, where multiple unlearning requests occur sequentially over time. In this work, we identify a fundamental limitation of this setting: plasticity collapse, a progressive breakdown in a model's ability to effectively forget. Through theoretical analysis of continual unlearning dynamics, we show that continual unlearning operations accumulate geometric constraints in parameter space, leading to saturated subspaces that restrict future updates. This structural effect induces two distinct failure modes: (1) Forward failure -- diminishing forgetting quality for subsequent tasks, and (2) Backward failure -- spontaneous re-memorization of previously forgotten information. Extensive experiments across multiple architectures, datasets, and methods in image classification confirm that plasticity collapse is not an artifact of specific implementations, but a pervasive phenomenon inherent to continual unlearning. Our findings reveal a critical barrier to the long-term reliability of machine unlearning systems and motivate the development of plasticity-preserving unlearning algorithms. Our code is available at https://github.com/TIML-Group/Continual-Machine-Unlearning-Plasticity-Collapse
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 24 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2026.
Builds on
24 of 30 references.
Closest ancestors · 12
Same direction, newest first
- 2026FG-OrIU: Towards Better Forgetting via Feature-Gradient Orthogonality for Incremental Unlearning20 Jan
- 2025An Unlearning Framework for Continual Learning22 Sep
- 2025A Unified Gradient-based Framework for Task-agnostic Continual Learning-Unlearning21 May
- 2025Exploring Nonlinear Pathway in Parameter Space for Machine Unlearning16 May
- 2025Tackling Fake Forgetting through Uncertainty Quantification31 Jan
- 2024MUNBa: Machine Unlearning via Nash Bargaining23 Nov
- 2024A Unified Framework for Continual Learning and Unlearning21 Aug
- 2024What makes unlearning hard and what to do about it3 Jun
- 2023SalUn: Empowering Machine Unlearning via Gradient-based Weight Saliency in Both Image Classification and Generation19 Oct
- 2023Towards Unbounded Machine Unlearning20 Feb
- 2021Unrolling SGD: Understanding Factors Influencing Machine Unlearning27 Sep
- 2021Machine Unlearning of Features and Labels26 Aug
Other references · 12
- 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
- 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 512
- 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 447
- 2020Amnesiac Machine Learningcited by 305
- 2020Descent-to-Delete: Gradient-Based Methods for Machine Unlearningcited by 303
- 2020Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognitioncited by 273
- 2023The Dormant Neuron Phenomenon in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 171
- 2020Implicit Under-Parameterization Inhibits Data-Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 134
- 2022Understanding and Preventing Capacity Loss in Reinforcement Learningcited by 124
- 2022How catastrophic can catastrophic forgetting be in linear regression?cited by 80
- 2021Wide Neural Networks Forget Less Catastrophicallycited by 64
- 2023Maintaining Plasticity in Continual Learning via Regenerative Regularizationcited by 63
Built on by
Not cited yet.