Calibration and Comparative Analysis of Forward-Looking Sonar and 3D Sonar for Enhanced Underwater Object Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Sonars generate a significant amount of noise. With the advent of new technology capable of producing full 3D point clouds, the noise is amplified in sparse point clouds, making it challenging to recognize features for navigation, recognition, or reconstruction. To address this challenge, we propose using two different sonar modalities: one that produces a 2D intensity image and another that generates a 3D point cloud. By implementing auto-calibration, we can filter out noisy features between the modalities to enhance feature extraction. Experiments demonstrate that auto-calibration improves performance over manual calibration by 5% and that filtering enhances feature extraction by more than 40% relative to the raw point cloud. Code and datasets are given at https://theaprilab.org/fls-3d-calibrator
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2026.
Builds on
6 of 23 references.
References · 6
- 2020Lift, Splat, Shoot: Encoding Images From Arbitrary Camera Rigs by Implicitly Unprojecting to 3Dcited by 1,044
- 2022BEVFusion: Multi-Task Multi-Sensor Fusion with Unified Bird's-Eye View Representationcited by 850
- 2021Boundary IoU: Improving Object-Centric Image Segmentation Evaluationcited by 188
- 2022Synthetic Sonar Image Simulation with Various Seabed Conditions for Automatic Target Recognitioncited by 5
- 2025Sonar Image Datasets: A Comprehensive Survey of Resources, Challenges, and Applicationscited by 2
- 2025Underwater Dense Mapping with the First Compact 3D Sonarcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.