mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Hyper-Fold: Exploring the Expressive Limit of Sequence-Geometry Learning for Proteins via Hypergraph Modeling

arXiv 2608.29207 ↗First posted 29 Aug 2026cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Protein structure modeling rests on a single computational primitive: the interaction between what a residue is (sequence content) and where it sits (three-dimensional geometry). What is the expressive limit of this layer class? We show that the complete bilinear operator over content-geometry outer products--the sufficient statistic of all second-order interactions--is the expressive ceiling, while the additive message passing of mainstream geometric GNNs is provably blind to content-geometry binding. We then introduce Hyper-Fold, a rank-K separable convolutional backbone approaching this ceiling at message-passing cost: each radius neighborhood is organized into a sequence hyperedge and a contact hyperedge, modulated by an edge-conditioned matrix-valued operator factorized into K learned basis operators with geometry-generated coefficients. Across enzyme function prediction, fold classification, and ligand binding site detection, Hyper-Fold and its hierarchical variant Hyper-Fold-Deep achieve the best results among protein-specific structure encoders; Hyper-Fold-Pocket, an anchored set-prediction head, surpasses UniSite-3D on UniSite-DS and two zero-shot benchmarks with no sequence language model features, 68x fewer parameters, and 4.8x lower latency--suggesting that a sufficiently expressive 3D backbone recovers information that fusion architectures previously borrowed from evolution-scale pretraining.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2026.

Builds on

25 of 40 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  3. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  4. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
  5. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  6. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,422
  7. 2018Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Cloudscited by 2,223
  8. 2020Point Transformercited by 1,470
  9. 2022DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 1,319
  10. 2017DeepFM: A Factorization-Machine based Neural Network for CTR Predictioncited by 676
  11. 2022DAB-DETR: Dynamic Anchor Boxes are Better Queries for DETRcited by 573
  12. 2017SchNet: A continuous-filter convolutional neural network for modeling quantum interactionscited by 571
13 more
  1. 2023DETRs Beat YOLOs on Real-time Object Detectioncited by 533
  2. 2018Hypergraph Neural Networkscited by 488
  3. 2022DN-DETR: Accelerate DETR Training by Introducing Query DeNoisingcited by 488
  4. 2018Invariant and Equivariant Graph Networkscited by 346
  5. 2020Learning from Protein Structure with Geometric Vector Perceptronscited by 313
  6. 2022Protein Representation Learning by Geometric Structure Pretrainingcited by 162
  7. 2022Learning Hierarchical Protein Representations via Complete 3D Graph Networkscited by 55
  8. 2024Hyper-YOLO: When Visual Object Detection Meets Hypergraph Computationcited by 29
  9. 2022Geometry-Complete Perceptron Networks for 3D Molecular Graphscited by 16
  10. 2024Evaluating representation learning on the protein structure universecited by 16
  11. 2024VN-EGNN: E(3)-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks with Virtual Nodes Enhance Protein Binding Site Identificationcited by 15
  12. 2023Hypergraph Isomorphism Computationcited by 10
  13. 2025UniSite: The First Cross-Structure Dataset and Learning Framework for End-to-End Ligand Binding Site Detectioncited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.