ORDDAR: Observation-Driven Reasoning for Distortion-Resilient Decision, Action, and Cognitive Recovery
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI agents increasingly perform long-term reasoning, planning, tool use, memory integration, and autonomous decision making, yet erroneous intermediate states can propagate and cause inconsistent decisions and unreliable outputs. Existing reasoning approaches mainly rely on iterative planning, self-reflection, augmented memory, or verification, but rarely localize and selectively repair faulty reasoning. We present ORDDAR (Observation-Driven Reasoning for Distortion-Resilient Decision, Action, and Cognitive Recovery), a reasoning framework that models reasoning as cognitive state transitions, detects localized distortions, retrieves related reasoning from prior experiences, and repairs only the affected states. ORDDAR therefore performs recovery at the local reasoning-transition level rather than regenerating the complete trajectory. Experiments across mathematical, commonsense, multi-hop, and clinical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate improved reasoning quality, recovery ability, and interpretability over multiple evaluated reasoning baselines.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2026.
Builds on
21 of 24 references.
References · 21
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
- 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
- 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,134
9 more
- 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agentscited by 956
- 2023MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentationcited by 339
- 2025Demystifying Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMscited by 323
- 2024TheAgentCompany: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Consequential Real World Taskscited by 306
- 2024When Can LLMs Actually Correct Their Own Mistakes? A Critical Survey of Self-Correction of LLMscited by 230
- 2024ScienceAgentBench: Toward Rigorous Assessment of Language Agents for Data-Driven Scientific Discoverycited by 208
- 2025Agent Lightning: Train ANY AI Agents with Reinforcement Learningcited by 94
- 2025DeepAnalyze: Agentic Large Language Models for Autonomous Data Sciencecited by 49
- 2025Rethinking External Slow-Thinking: From Snowball Errors to Probability of Correct Reasoningcited by 36
Built on by
Not cited yet.