Representation of syntax in LLMs through the lens of linear distance and similarity-aware entropy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Structural probes were introduced by Hewitt and Manning to reconstruct syntactic trees from a neural language model's latent representations. They are evaluated by calculating the proportion of syntactic tree edges correctly reconstructed over an annotated corpus (as measured by undirected unlabeled attachment score). Here, we disaggregate this measure, considering undirected attachment score by label (UASL), which assesses the reconstruction accuracy of each syntactic relation separately, establishing important differences among relations that overlap linguistic distinctions. Moreover, we identify two factors that predict most of UASL's variability across relations: (i) the mean and dispersion of the linear distance (on a log scale) between the related words, and (ii) the diversity (similarity-aware entropy) of the syntactic relation's head. These results, which hold across a range of model sizes and architectures, shed light on the degree of abstraction of the representation of syntax in language models and the dependence of such representation on geometric properties of the embedding space.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2026.
Builds on
23 of 51 references.
References · 23
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,583
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
- 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,254
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 1,003
- 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 815
- 2024Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and Inferencecited by 554
- 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 457
- 2019Visualizing and Measuring the Geometry of BERTcited by 216
- 2021Masked Language Modeling and the Distributional Hypothesis: Order Word Matters Pre-training for Littlecited by 177
11 more
- 2020Finding Universal Grammatical Relations in Multilingual BERTcited by 110
- 2021Conditional probing: measuring usable information beyond a baselinecited by 62
- 2025Harnessing the Universal Geometry of Embeddingscited by 55
- 2021Let's Play Mono-Poly: BERT Can Reveal Words' Polysemy Level and Partitionability into Sensescited by 39
- 2022Probing for Incremental Parse States in Autoregressive Language Modelscited by 24
- 2022When Does Syntax Mediate Neural Language Model Performance? Evidence from Dropout Probescited by 12
- 2024Towards a Similarity-adjusted Surprisal Theorycited by 9
- 2020Deep Clustering of Text Representations for Supervision-free Probing of Syntaxcited by 7
- 2019GAIT: A Geometric Approach to Information Theorycited by 5
- 2024Transformers, Contextualism, and Polysemycited by 5
- 2022Probing for targeted syntactic knowledge through grammatical error detectioncited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.