Parameter-Efficient pretrained-CT-to-MRI Transfer for Rectal Cancer Segmentation: Performance-Calibration Trade-offs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate rectal cancer segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for adaptive radiotherapy and tumor response assessment, but deployment also requires computational efficiency and informative, calibrated uncertainty estimates. We therefore introduce SWIFT, a SWin pretrained model wIth parameter-eFficient and Tumor-aware fine-tuning for rectal cancer segmentation. A Swin V2 encoder pretrained on 10,444 public 3D CT volumes using a DINOv2-style objective was adapted to T2-weighted MRI through four cumulative configurations: full fine-tuning (SWIFT), decoder compression (SWIFTe), low-rank adaptation (SWIFTe-LoRA), and a four-member LoRA-decoder ensemble (SWIFTe-LDE4). Geometric accuracy, tumor detection, radiomic agreement, and probability calibration were evaluated on a held-out 247-case test set from a single-institution cohort acquired using 1.5 or 3 Tesla GE scanners. Compared with SWIFT, SWIFTe reduced total parameters by 70.1% (from 72.8M to 21.8M) and increased tumor detection rate from 89.9% to 93.9%, while achieving a slightly lower median surface DSC (0.61 versus 0.62) and improved radiomic agreement. In a separate SWIFTe ablation, removing tumor-aware augmentation reduced detection from 93.9% to 89.9% but increased surface DSC from 0.61 to 0.64, demonstrating a detection-boundary-agreement trade-off. SWIFTe-LoRA used 14.6% of SWIFTe's trainable parameters while retaining similar segmentation performance. SWIFTe-LDE4 achieved the lowest calibration errors among the four configurations after temperature scaling (expected calibration error, 0.217; Brier score, 0.222), although the absolute expected calibration error indicates residual miscalibration. Similar efficiency-calibration patterns were observed using the public VoCo checkpoint, supporting robustness across pretrained initializations rather than external clinical generalizability.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2026.
Builds on
12 of 27 references.
References · 12
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2021Self-Supervised Pre-Training of Swin Transformers for 3D Medical Image Analysiscited by 418
- 2021Self-supervised Pretraining of Visual Features in the Wildcited by 197
- 2019Confidence Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty Estimation for Deep Medical Image Segmentationcited by 162
- 2022Self-supervised 3D anatomy segmentation using self-distilled masked image transformer (SMIT)cited by 35
- 2024Large-Scale 3D Medical Image Pre-training with Geometric Context Priorscited by 34
- 2024LoRA-Ensemble: Efficient Uncertainty Modelling for Self-Attention Networkscited by 20
- 2024Sparse Bayesian Networks: Efficient Uncertainty Quantification in Medical Image Analysiscited by 8
- 2024Quantifying uncertainty in lung cancer segmentation with foundation models applied to mixed-domain datasetscited by 2
- 2024Self-supervised learning improves robustness of deep learning lung tumor segmentation to CT imaging differencescited by 1
- 2025Tumor-anchored deep feature random forests for out-of-distribution detection in lung cancer segmentationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.