mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Letters hide the truth from our eyes: English homophones have meaningfully different phonetic realizations

arXiv 2608.26749 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The distribution of spoken word duration of English homophones is known to co-vary with frequency of use. This study investigates whether other aspects of the phonetic realization of homophones also differ. A series of quantitative investigations of 14,000 homophone tokens in American television news broadcasts revealed that the tokens of homophone pairs such as textitweight and textitwait have different phonetic realizations, and that these can be predicted from their meanings in utterance context. These systematic differences remain even when taking duration-related variation into account. Time-normalized spectrograms emerged as an excellent tool for probing the fine details of phonetic realization, and obviate the need for phonetic transcriptions, which inevitably hide the phonetic truth from our eyes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 111 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2026.

Builds on

3 of 111 references.

References · 3

  1. 2024Word-specific tonal realizations in Mandarincited by 11
  2. 2025The realization of tones in spontaneous spoken Taiwan Mandarin: a corpus-based survey and theory-driven computational modelingcited by 7
  3. 2025A new kid on the block: Distributional semantics predicts the word-specific tone signatures of monosyllabic words in conversational Taiwan Mandarincited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.