mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Word-specific tonal realizations in Mandarin

arXiv 2405.07006 ↗First posted 11 May 2024cs.CLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The pitch contours of Mandarin two-character words are generally understood as being shaped by the underlying tones of the constituent single-character words, in interaction with articulatory constraints imposed by factors such as speech rate, co-articulation with adjacent tones, segmental make-up, and predictability. This study shows that tonal realization is also partially determined by words' meanings. We first show, on the basis of a corpus of Taiwan Mandarin spontaneous conversations, using a generalized additive regression model, and focusing on the rise-fall tone pattern, that after controlling for effects of speaker and context, word type is a stronger predictor of tonal realization than all the previously established word-form related predictors combined. Importantly, the addition of information about meaning in context improves prediction accuracy even further. We then proceed to show, using computational modeling with context-specific word embeddings, that token-specific pitch contours predict word type with 50% accuracy on held-out data, and that context-sensitive, token-specific embeddings can predict the shape of pitch contours with 40% accuracy. These accuracies, which are an order of magnitude above chance level, suggest that the relation between words' pitch contours and their meanings are sufficiently strong to be potentially functional for language users. The theoretical implications of these empirical findings are discussed.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 160 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2024.

Builds on

18 of 160 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  5. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  6. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
  7. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
  8. 2020Probing Pretrained Language Models for Lexical Semanticscited by 156
  9. 2021WhiteningBERT: An Easy Unsupervised Sentence Embedding Approachcited by 68
  10. 2021Let's Play Mono-Poly: BERT Can Reveal Words' Polysemy Level and Partitionability into Sensescited by 39
  11. 2015Efficient Non-parametric Estimation of Multiple Embeddings per Word in Vector Spacecited by 35
  12. 2015Smoothing parameter and model selection for general smooth modelscited by 23
6 more
  1. 2021Modeling morphology with Linear Discriminative Learning: considerations and design choicescited by 7
  2. 2021Vector Space Morphology with Linear Discriminative Learningcited by 7
  3. 2020Prosody leaks into the memories of wordscited by 6
  4. 2021A note on the modeling of the effects of experimental time in psycholinguistic experimentscited by 6
  5. 2022How trial-to-trial learning shapes mappings in the mental lexicon: Modelling Lexical Decision with Linear Discriminative Learningcited by 4
  6. 2023Frequency effects in Linear Discriminative Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

9 papers.