mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RegulAR: Graph-Grounded Error Recognition and Assistance for Procedural Tasks in AR

arXiv 2608.26715 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2026cs.HCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Errors are inevitable in procedural tasks, yet most AR guidance systems focus on step-by-step instruction delivery rather than helping users recognize and recover from mistakes. We present RegulAR, an AR task assistant for procedural error recognition and recovery. RegulAR models task instructions as a hierarchical dependency graph and combines this structure with a Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) to interpret egocentric observations during execution. This enables RegulAR to track progress, identify deviations by error type, estimate their impact on later steps, and deliver appropriately salient interventions through an in-situ head-up display that visualizes task state and recovery guidance. By making procedural structure explicit, RegulAR supports not only next-step guidance, but also reasoning about what went wrong, why it matters, and how users can get back on track. In a within-subject study (N=12), participants reported better task-structure understanding and recovery support with RegulAR than the MLLM-only baseline.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Vision-Based Mistake Analysis in Procedural Activities: A Review of Advances and Challenges
  2. 2024Transparent and Coherent Procedural Mistake Detection
  3. 2024TI-PREGO: Chain of Thought and In-Context Learning for Online Mistake Detection in PRocedural EGOcentric Videos
  4. 2026Tasks over Application Manuals: Revealing Gaps in Long-Horizon Procedural Reasoning for Language Models
  5. 2026Evaluating Agentic Capabilities Before Post-Training: An End-to-End Approach
  6. 2026ConflictVLA-Bench: Benchmarking Behavioral Responses of Vision-Language-Action Models to Premise Conflicts
  7. 2026CUAAudit: Meta-Evaluation of Vision-Language Models as Auditors of Autonomous Computer-Use Agents
  8. 2025Can Large Multimodal Models Actively Recognize Faulty Inputs? A Systematic Evaluation Framework of Their Input Scrutiny Ability