TrapVLA: Trapping Vision-Language-Action Models in Configured Failure Modes
On the map: Vision-language-action models → Failure recovery and robustness
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
This work introduces Configured Failure Trapping, a novel backdoor attack task against Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models, which aims to activate attacks through stealthy textual triggers and induce configured failure modes. Unlike prior backdoor attacks that treat any task failure as a successful attack, Configured Failure Trapping requires the attacker to control how the robot fails (e.g., causing the robot to grasp with a specified positional offset), making it substantially more challenging and hard to detect. To support the new task, we propose an effective data engine for synthesizing high-quality target trajectories and an automated suite for measuring configured-failure fidelity. Then, based on this foundation, we construct two new benchmarks, namely Trap-LIBERO and Trap-RoboTwin, that instantiate Configured Failure Trapping across four representative failure modes. To address this task, we identify sparse action deviation as a critical challenge and accordingly propose a novel method named TrapVLA, which explicitly learns trigger-induced action residuals to steer the policy toward the configured failure behavior. Extensive experiments across simulation benchmarks and real-world robotic settings show that TrapVLA effectively injects configured failure modes into VLA models while largely preserving performance on clean data. Project page: https://john-liua.github.io/TrapVLA/
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Failure recovery and robustness, one of 13 directions in Vision-language-action models. Builds on 16 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2026.
Builds on
16 of 23 references.
References · 16
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,887
- 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,407
- 2024Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policycited by 1,484
- 2023LIBERO: Benchmarking Knowledge Transfer for Lifelong Robot Learningcited by 1,410
- 2025Fine-Tuning Vision-Language-Action Models: Optimizing Speed and Successcited by 883
- 2025RoboTwin 2.0: A Scalable Data Generator and Benchmark with Strong Domain Randomization for Robust Bimanual Robotic Manipulationcited by 518
- 2024RT-H: Action Hierarchies Using Languagecited by 210
- 2024PaliGemma 2: A Family of Versatile VLMs for Transfercited by 207
- 2024Exploring the Adversarial Vulnerabilities of Vision-Language-Action Models in Roboticscited by 73
- 2026Qwen-VLA: Unifying Vision-Language-Action Modeling across Tasks, Environments, and Robot Embodimentscited by 44
- 2025BadVLA: Towards Backdoor Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models via Objective-Decoupled Optimizationcited by 38
4 more
- 2025Do What You Say: Steering Vision-Language-Action Models via Runtime Reasoning-Action Alignment Verificationcited by 26
- 2025RobustVLA: On Robustness of Vision-Language-Action Model against Multi-Modal Perturbationscited by 25
- 2026VLANeXt: Recipes for Building Strong VLA Modelscited by 12
- 2026State Backdoor: Towards Stealthy Real-world Poisoning Attack on Vision-Language-Action Model in State Spacecited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025AttackVLA: Benchmarking Adversarial and Backdoor Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2025DropVLA: An Action-Level Backdoor Attack on Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2026FATE-VLA:Failue-aware test generation for vision-language-action models
- 2025FailSafe: Reasoning and Recovery from Failures in Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2026VLA-FAIL: Efficient Task Failure Detection for Finetuned Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2025SAFE: Multitask Failure Detection for Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2025Adversarial Attacks on Robotic Vision Language Action Models
- 2026Hide-and-Seek in Trajectories: Discovering Failure Signals for VLA Runtime Monitoring