mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Resolving Multi-Modal Regression by Difference-Quotient-Based Clustering:Fast Coarse Conditional-Label Assignment

arXiv 2608.25467 ↗First posted 26 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal regression suffers from the mean-collapse pathology: under squared loss, an unconstrained regressor converges to the conditional mean, which for K > 1 lies away from all modes. We attribute this failure to pairwise contradictions--samples with nearly identical inputs but distant outputs--and propose Difference-Quotient Clustering (DQC), which partitions data to minimize intra-cluster output-vs-input discrepancy. Each sample is assigned to the cluster that minimizes its maximum contradiction ratio; a logits generator and a conditional network are then trained on the resulting labels. Since the generating modality is unknown at test time, we evaluate via minimum squared error (minMSE) against all K true outputs. On synthetic benchmarks (K=5, 10), DQC achieves test minMSE 0.19 (K=5, nx=500), versus 0.09 for an oracle, 1.08 for random labels, and 1.33 for mean collapse. We observe two empirical regularities: larger intra-cluster contradictions require deeper networks, and oracle labels generalize from fewer samples than cluster-derived equivalents. The clustering is a hard, parallelizable O(n^2/2) front-end for coarse conditional assignment, reducing the burden of downstream generative refinement. A second-stage re-clustering on residual errors is outlined as future work.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2026.

Builds on

4 of 7 references.

References · 4

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  2. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
  3. 2016Learning in an Uncertain World: Representing Ambiguity Through Multiple Hypothesescited by 97
  4. 2019Overcoming Limitations of Mixture Density Networks: A Sampling and Fitting Framework for Multimodal Future Predictioncited by 96

Built on by

Not cited yet.