What Should a Large Language Model See? Physical Invariants as a Data Representation for PDE Discovery
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding how molecular interactions govern macroscopic behaviour is a central challenge in molecular sciences. However, conventional theory building cannot keep pace with the vast datasets modern experimentation routinely produces. Large language models offer a promising route to automating theory construction, but a spatiotemporal field cannot be directly placed in a prompt. Existing models generally learn about the data only through a score measuring how well each proposal fits it. Here we introduce data interpretation, a stage that measures the field into the quantities a theorist would consult and supplies them to the model as a direct input. On a benchmark of simulated fields, interpretation nearly triples the accuracy of recovered equations relative to showing the raw data, at negligible computational cost and without any training. By allowing a language model to read field data as a theorist does, data interpretation offers a practical route to automated field theory construction that can coevolve with experimentation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2026.
Builds on
6 of 9 references.
References · 6
- 2024LLM-SR: Scientific Equation Discovery via Programming with Large Language Modelscited by 133
- 2024Symbolic Regression with a Learned Concept Librarycited by 83
- 2025DrSR: LLM based Scientific Equation Discovery with Dual Reasoning from Data and Experiencecited by 22
- 2026Influence-Guided Symbolic Regression: Scientific Discovery via LLM-Driven Equation Search with Granular Feedbackcited by 11
- 2026LLM-ACES: Closed-Loop Discovery of Dynamical Systems with LLM-Guided Adaptive Searchcited by 7
- 2026From Residuals to Reasons: LLM-Guided Mechanism Inference from Tabular Datacited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.