mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Influence-Guided Symbolic Regression: Scientific Discovery via LLM-Driven Equation Search with Granular Feedback

arXiv 2605.29184 ↗First posted 27 May 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising avenue for scientific discovery, yet their application to symbolic regression is often constrained by inefficient search strategies and coarse feedback signals. Current methods typically guide LLMs using scalar metrics (e.g., global Mean Squared Error), which fail to identify which components of a proposed equation are driving performance or causing error. We introduce textitInfluence-Guided Symbolic Regression (IGSR), a method that frames equation discovery as an iterative two-step process combining diverse term generation with rigorous selection: an LLM generates candidate basis functions psij(x) for a linear model, which are then evaluated using granular influence scores Deltaj. These scores quantify each term's marginal contribution to generalization accuracy, enabling an influence-guided pruning process that systematically refines the model structure. Integrating this mechanism into a Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) enables navigating the combinatorial search space while balancing exploration of novel functional forms with exploitation of high-influence components. We demonstrate IGSR's effectiveness on a diverse suite of benchmarks, including LLM-SRBench, pharmacological PKPD models, an epidemiological simulation, and real-world genomic data. Notably, we validate the framework's capacity for genuine discovery in a case study using a high-dimensional biological dataset, in which IGSR identified a novel relationship between DNA methylation and RNA Polymerase II pausing; a hypothesis that was subsequently supported via wet-lab experimentation.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2026.

Builds on

8 of 90 references.

References · 8

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
  3. 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 314
  4. 2023Emergent autonomous scientific research capabilities of large language modelscited by 132
  5. 2023Interpretable Machine Learning for Science with PySR and SymbolicRegression.jlcited by 54
  6. 2020DyNODE: Neural Ordinary Differential Equations for Dynamics Modeling in Continuous Controlcited by 18
  7. 2023Differentiable Genetic Programming for High-dimensional Symbolic Regressioncited by 4
  8. 2025Sparse Interpretable Deep Learning with LIES Networks for Symbolic Regressioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 11.

11 papers.