See More, Detect Less? Taming Information Leakage in Multi-View Anomaly Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In multi-view anomaly detection, more cross-view information can actually hurt. When multiple inspection views are naively fused in a reconstruction-based pipeline, normal cues from intact views propagate to the decoder, which faithfully reconstructs anomalous regions, collapsing the reconstruction gap the detector depends on. We call this failure mode cross-view information leakage and show that effective multi-view fusion must explicitly restrict the information reaching the decoder. Building on this insight, we present GLAD(Global-Local Attention Driven framework), the first framework combining vision foundation model features with local and global cross-view fusion for multi-view anomaly detection. The Multi-view Merging Attention (MMA) module performs local cross-view fusion at linear complexity with learnable view importance weighting and token-wise gating, letting each view selectively incorporate fine-grained evidence from other views at O(N) cost. The Object-Guided Attention (OGA) module captures global context by aggregating class tokens from all views into a single object-level representation and broadcasting it back to patch tokens via temperature-scaled sigmoid gating, replacing the original patch representations rather than adding a residual to preserve the reconstruction gap. Experiments on Real-IAD and MANTA-Tiny show that GLAD outperforms state-of-the-art methods across sample-, image-, and pixel-level metrics, confirming that principled information restriction is key to multi-view anomaly reasoning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2026.
Builds on
24 of 42 references.
References · 24
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
- 2021Perceiver: General Perception with Iterative Attentioncited by 1,104
- 2021CrossViT: Cross-Attention Multi-Scale Vision Transformer for Image Classificationcited by 806
- 2021Going deeper with Image Transformerscited by 764
- 2020PaDiM: a Patch Distribution Modeling Framework for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 594
- 2021CutPaste: Self-Supervised Learning for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 531
- 2021DRAEM -- A discriminatively trained reconstruction embedding for surface anomaly detectioncited by 514
- 2022A Unified Model for Multi-class Anomaly Detectioncited by 268
- 2022DeSTSeg: Segmentation Guided Denoising Student-Teacher for Anomaly Detectioncited by 154
12 more
- 2024RealNet: A Feature Selection Network with Realistic Synthetic Anomaly for Anomaly Detectioncited by 116
- 2023AnomalyDiffusion: Few-Shot Anomaly Image Generation with Diffusion Modelcited by 111
- 2025AA-CLIP: Enhancing Zero-shot Anomaly Detection via Anomaly-Aware CLIPcited by 73
- 2024ReLU2 Wins: Discovering Efficient Activation Functions for Sparse LLMscited by 67
- 2024AnomalyDINO: Boosting Patch-based Few-shot Anomaly Detection with DINOv2cited by 53
- 2024UniVAD: A Training-free Unified Model for Few-shot Visual Anomaly Detectioncited by 28
- 2024MANTA: A Large-Scale Multi-View and Visual-Text Anomaly Detection Dataset for Tiny Objectscited by 26
- 2024Learning Multi-view Anomaly Detection with Efficient Adaptive Selectioncited by 9
- 2024Unlocking the Potential of Reverse Distillation for Anomaly Detectioncited by 8
- 2025AF-CLIP: Zero-Shot Anomaly Detection via Anomaly-Focused CLIP Adaptationcited by 7
- 2024ROADS: Robust Prompt-driven Multi-Class Anomaly Detection under Domain Shiftcited by 5
- 2025Robust Multi-View Learning via Representation Fusion of Sample-Level Attention and Alignment of Simulated Perturbationcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.