Semantic Reconstruction and 3-D Detection via Learned Multi-Pair Fusion in RF Imaging
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider a multistatic radio-frequency imaging problem with anisotropy, in which the reflection from a point depends on the positions of the transmit (Tx) and receive (Rx) arrays. The goal is to label the voxels of a field of view by a finite set of semantic classes and to group them into object instances. For the image formation of each Tx--Rx pair we apply a standard inverse-problem solver, and we feed the resulting per-pair reconstructions into a trained three-dimensional (3-D) U-Net that performs the fusion implicitly and the per-voxel classification explicitly. On a controlled, under-determined multistatic setup, we consider the following image formation methods: back-projection (BP) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) from a single deterministic snapshot, and incoherent BP and group-LASSO from multiple fading snapshots. For each imaging method we train a separate U-Net that fuses the six Tx--Rx pairs (its input channels) and assigns each voxel a probability vector over the classes. Taking the most probable class gives a labeled volume---the semantic reconstruction. Object instances and their oriented bounding boxes then follow by geometric post-processing (clustering and principal-component analysis). Across a wide range of signal-to-noise ratio, the semantic reconstruction (scored against ground truth by segmentation intersection-over-union) and the resulting 3-D detection degrade far more gracefully than the classical intensity reconstruction: the detection in particular stays reliable well into noise levels at which that reconstruction has dissolved. Because real scenes contain objects of classes the network was not trained on, we add an explicit unknown class trained by outlier exposure, which labels held-out novel objects as unknown instead of mislabeling them as a known class by reconstructed shape.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.
Builds on
17 of 24 references.
References · 17
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,689
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,292
- 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,524
- 2017Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 1,498
- 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,476
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,299
- 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 942
- 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 732
- 2021RadarScenes: A Real-World Radar Point Cloud Data Set for Automotive Applicationscited by 61
5 more
- 2020CARRADA Dataset: Camera and Automotive Radar with Range-Angle-Doppler Annotationscited by 60
- 2023Wavefield Networked Sensing: Principles, Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1
- 2025Toward Multiband Sensing in FR3: Frequency Anisotropy Characterization and Non-Contiguous Bands Aggregation Algorithmscited by 1
- 2025Multi-view imaging in networked sensing systems: A covariance-based approachcited by 1
- 2026OFDM-Based ISAC Imaging of Extended Targets via Inverse Virtual Aperture Processingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.