mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Physical Response-and-Memory Model for Muon Optimization

arXiv 2608.22994 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2026cs.LG cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.stat-mechcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training large language models is costly. How low a loss the same compute can ultimately reach depends on how each step's gradient is converted into a weight update; the rule that performs this conversion is the optimizer. From SGD and AdamW to the recent Muon, effective update rules have mostly been shaped by engineering intuition and then selected on benchmarks. Muon semi-orthogonalizes the momentum matrix before applying the update and has kept breaking records on public training benchmarks; yet why the semi-orthogonalized direction works, and over how long a history the momentum should average, are two questions at present answered mainly by experience. Here we treat the weight matrix during training as a responsive medium with memory and build a physical model for it, in which both questions find answers: the semi-orthogonalized direction is the maximally dissipative response under an output-side safety budget, which explains why it works; momentum is the internal stress accumulated by the medium; how long it should average is set by the relaxation of this stress, and a real medium relaxes on more than one timescale, the simplest form being one fast and one slow. On this basis we propose the Bi-Maxwell optimizer. The framework further yields a testable consequence: gradient directions change fast early in training and more slowly later, so the optimal memory length should grow with training stage; step-by-step measurements of a proxy for it by a read-only probe across 8 independent training trajectories are consistent with this consequence. Replacing the memory kernel alone, from a single timescale to two, brings training to the target loss in noticeably fewer steps on a public large-language-model optimizer benchmark.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.

Builds on

15 of 42 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018Shampoo: Preconditioned Stochastic Tensor Optimizationcited by 413
  2. 2025Muon is Scalable for LLM Trainingcited by 381
  3. 2018An Empirical Model of Large-Batch Trainingcited by 268
  4. 2023Sophia: A Scalable Stochastic Second-order Optimizer for Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 260
  5. 2024SOAP: Improving and Stabilizing Shampoo using Adamcited by 179
  6. 2025The Polar Express: Optimal Matrix Sign Methods and Their Application to the Muon Algorithmcited by 104
  7. 2025NorMuon: Making Muon more efficient and scalablecited by 74
  8. 2021The effective noise of Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 25
  9. 2026Adam Improves Muon: Adaptive Moment Estimation with Orthogonalized Momentumcited by 13
  10. 2019Demon: Improved Neural Network Training with Momentum Decaycited by 11
  11. 2022Born-Infeld (BI) for AI: Energy-Conserving Descent (ECD) for Optimizationcited by 10
  12. 2025Connections between Schedule-Free Optimizers, AdEMAMix, and Accelerated SGD Variantscited by 8
3 more
  1. 2023Bidirectional Looking with A Novel Double Exponential Moving Average to Adaptive and Non-adaptive Momentum Optimizerscited by 6
  2. 2026Muon with Spectral Guidance: Efficient Optimization for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 4
  3. 2026NuMuon: Nuclear-Norm-Constrained Muon for Compressible LLM Trainingcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.