HAWKEYE: Seeing One Layer Deeper -- A Cohesion-Aware Structural Channel for Temporal Link Prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
State-of-the-art temporal-link-prediction (TLP) models are, in essence, multi-channel information aggregators: they combine an interaction-history channel, a time-encoding channel, and a structure channel. The first two have been refined relentlessly; the structure channel remains a crude afterthought -- DyGFormer encodes it as a 1--2-bit neighbour-cooccurrence count. We begin with a measurement: on sparse temporal graphs the classical 1-hop common-neighbour signal is near-random (discriminative AUC ≈ 0.50), because two nodes almost never share a direct neighbour; the genuinely discriminative signal lies one hop deeper -- the 2-hop cohesive bridge, whose discAUC reaches 0.73--0.98, on both bipartite and non-bipartite graphs. Motivated by this, we propose HAWKEYE, a cohesion-aware structural channel that incrementally maintains the classical k-family of cohesiveness indicators (degree → k-core → k-truss) and forms 2-hop cohesive-bridge features. HAWKEYE is a drop-in replacement for a temporal-graph model's native structure channel, with no change to the backbone. Swapping HAWKEYE into DyGFormer improves test AP/MRR over the cooccurrence channel by +0.6 to +10.8 points across six multi-seed-validated datasets (uci, enron, USLegis, CanParl, reddit, mooc). On the bipartite recommendation benchmark tgbl-subreddit, a 3-seed single-pass struct-only ablation shows HAWKEYE nearly doubling the baseline test MRR (0.103±0.003 → 0.204±0.005, +10.1 points across all three seeds); the streaming pipeline scales to the 67M-edge tgbl-flight in five minutes per pass. We further characterise when it helps: the gain tracks a graph's training-free 2-hop discAUC and vanishes on degenerate or saturated graphs -- a predictable boundary. All code, data, and figure-generation scripts are released.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.
Builds on
14 of 44 references.
References · 14
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2018Link Prediction Based on Graph Neural Networkscited by 829
- 2020Inductive Representation Learning on Temporal Graphscited by 454
- 2019Predicting Dynamic Embedding Trajectory in Temporal Interaction Networkscited by 443
- 2019Representation Learning for Dynamic Graphs: A Surveycited by 260
- 2019Time2Vec: Learning a Vector Representation of Timecited by 208
- 2023Towards Better Dynamic Graph Learning: New Architecture and Unified Librarycited by 154
- 2023Do We Really Need Complicated Model Architectures For Temporal Networks?cited by 141
- 2023Temporal Graph Benchmark for Machine Learning on Temporal Graphscited by 137
- 2020Foundations and modelling of dynamic networks using Dynamic Graph Neural Networks: A surveycited by 123
- 2024Improving Temporal Link Prediction via Temporal Walk Matrix Projectioncited by 21
2 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.