mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

HAWKEYE: Seeing One Layer Deeper -- A Cohesion-Aware Structural Channel for Temporal Link Prediction

arXiv 2608.22727 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2026cs.DB cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

State-of-the-art temporal-link-prediction (TLP) models are, in essence, multi-channel information aggregators: they combine an interaction-history channel, a time-encoding channel, and a structure channel. The first two have been refined relentlessly; the structure channel remains a crude afterthought -- DyGFormer encodes it as a 1--2-bit neighbour-cooccurrence count. We begin with a measurement: on sparse temporal graphs the classical 1-hop common-neighbour signal is near-random (discriminative AUC ≈ 0.50), because two nodes almost never share a direct neighbour; the genuinely discriminative signal lies one hop deeper -- the 2-hop cohesive bridge, whose discAUC reaches 0.73--0.98, on both bipartite and non-bipartite graphs. Motivated by this, we propose HAWKEYE, a cohesion-aware structural channel that incrementally maintains the classical k-family of cohesiveness indicators (degree → k-core → k-truss) and forms 2-hop cohesive-bridge features. HAWKEYE is a drop-in replacement for a temporal-graph model's native structure channel, with no change to the backbone. Swapping HAWKEYE into DyGFormer improves test AP/MRR over the cooccurrence channel by +0.6 to +10.8 points across six multi-seed-validated datasets (uci, enron, USLegis, CanParl, reddit, mooc). On the bipartite recommendation benchmark tgbl-subreddit, a 3-seed single-pass struct-only ablation shows HAWKEYE nearly doubling the baseline test MRR (0.103±0.003 → 0.204±0.005, +10.1 points across all three seeds); the streaming pipeline scales to the 67M-edge tgbl-flight in five minutes per pass. We further characterise when it helps: the gain tracks a graph's training-free 2-hop discAUC and vanishes on degenerate or saturated graphs -- a predictable boundary. All code, data, and figure-generation scripts are released.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.

Builds on

14 of 44 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  3. 2018Link Prediction Based on Graph Neural Networkscited by 829
  4. 2020Inductive Representation Learning on Temporal Graphscited by 454
  5. 2019Predicting Dynamic Embedding Trajectory in Temporal Interaction Networkscited by 443
  6. 2019Representation Learning for Dynamic Graphs: A Surveycited by 260
  7. 2019Time2Vec: Learning a Vector Representation of Timecited by 208
  8. 2023Towards Better Dynamic Graph Learning: New Architecture and Unified Librarycited by 154
  9. 2023Do We Really Need Complicated Model Architectures For Temporal Networks?cited by 141
  10. 2023Temporal Graph Benchmark for Machine Learning on Temporal Graphscited by 137
  11. 2020Foundations and modelling of dynamic networks using Dynamic Graph Neural Networks: A surveycited by 123
  12. 2024Improving Temporal Link Prediction via Temporal Walk Matrix Projectioncited by 21
2 more
  1. 2024Efficient Neural Common Neighbor for Temporal Graph Link Predictioncited by 18
  2. 2020K-Core based Temporal Graph Convolutional Network for Dynamic Graphscited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.