Kernel Token Contradiction: a Fast and Principled Approach for LLM Claim Uncertainty Quantification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Claim-level Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) aims to mitigate the lack of reliability of Large Language Models (LLMs) by evaluating the factuality of each claim in their outputs. We introduce Kernel Token Contradiction (KTC), a lightweight approach to compute claim-level UQ under realistic white-box conditions. KTC represents the candidate tokens involved in LLM generation as a positive semi-definite kernel that integrates both the LLM's conditional distribution and a token contradiction score. We then use the Von Neumann entropy to quantify the uncertainty of this kernel. To estimate token contradiction, we develop a new approach based on frequency statistics from the Wikipedia corpus. Although CPU-only, our approach achieves over an 8.2x speedup compared to state-of-the-art GPU-accelerated methods based on cross-encoders, and over a 65x speedup compared to CPU-only methods with comparable performance. Our evaluation spans two benchmarks across four European languages and 16 different models. KTC not only matches the average performance of existing methods but also outperforms them in high-precision regimes. This combination of computational efficiency and accuracy makes real-time monitoring of LLM outputs practical in production.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2026.
Builds on
29 of 36 references.
References · 29
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,611
- 2023FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioningcited by 2,551
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
- 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 903
- 2023Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generationcited by 795
- 2023The Falcon Series of Open Language Modelscited by 526
- 2024INSIDE: LLMs' Internal States Retain the Power of Hallucination Detectioncited by 317
17 more
- 2023Generating with Confidence: Uncertainty Quantification for Black-box Large Language Modelscited by 286
- 2024Fact-Checking the Output of Large Language Models via Token-Level Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 159
- 2024Kernel Language Entropy: Fine-grained Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs from Semantic Similaritiescited by 156
- 2023Shifting Attention to Relevance: Towards the Predictive Uncertainty Quantification of Free-Form Large Language Modelscited by 147
- 2024To Believe or Not to Believe Your LLMcited by 120
- 2023Enhancing Uncertainty-Based Hallucination Detection with Stronger Focuscited by 98
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination in Large Language, Image, Video and Audio Foundation Modelscited by 98
- 2022Looking for a Needle in a Haystack: A Comprehensive Study of Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translationcited by 60
- 2024CroissantLLM: A Truly Bilingual French-English Language Modelcited by 52
- 2025SemEval-2025 Task 3: Mu-SHROOM, the Multilingual Shared Task on Hallucinations and Related Observable Overgeneration Mistakescited by 27
- 2025Beyond Semantic Entropy: Boosting LLM Uncertainty Quantification with Pairwise Semantic Similaritycited by 26
- 2024Cost-Effective Hallucination Detection for LLMscited by 16
- 2025HalluEntity: Benchmarking and Understanding Entity-Level Hallucination Detectioncited by 13
- 2025When Models Lie, We Learn: Multilingual Span-Level Hallucination Detection with PsiloQAcited by 13
- 2025Improving Semantic Uncertainty Quantification in LVLMs with Semantic Gaussian Processescited by 3
- 2024Developing a Reliable, Fast, General-Purpose Hallucination Detection and Mitigation Servicecited by 2
- 2025MUCH: A Multilingual Claim Hallucination Benchmarkcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.