mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dynamics-Aware Weighting for Deep Learning Forecasts of Chaotic Systems

arXiv 2608.22277 ↗First posted 23 Aug 2026cs.LG physics.comp-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning surrogates have become powerful tools for simulating and forecasting complex dynamical systems, yet their utility remains limited by catastrophic error accumulation during long-term autoregressive rollouts. This behavior is partly tied to the nature of the underlying systems: chaotic spatiotemporal systems visit phase space unevenly, with dynamics dominated by recurrent, low-dimensional quiescent states and characterized by rare and dynamically complex regime transitions. Trained under a sample-wise uniform objective, standard neural surrogates allocate their finite capacity to the statistically more numerous low-dimensional quiescent states, systematically under-representing the transient regimes that trigger disproportionate, localized errors. Existing imbalanced-regression methods tackle this issue by reweighting samples according to target-space density. However, statistical target-space rarity does not coincide with the intrinsic dynamical rarity encoded in the recurrence geometry of the attractor. To address this, we introduce Dynamics-Aware Weighting (DAW), a data-centric objective reweighting framework. Using the local dimension d from dynamical systems theory as an a priori measure of a state's dynamical complexity, DAW reshapes the loss landscape to allocate representational capacity toward the sparse, high-d regimes where forecast errors are systematically large. On the chaotic KS equation, DAW consistently outperforms uniform training as well as weighting based on target-space rarity, and its randomly permuted ablation, reducing long-term autoregressive error relative to all baselines. Event-level analysis shows that DAW achieves this by suppressing the localized error amplifications incurred during sharp jumps in the local dimension d, which typically accompany complex physical processes such as wave-merging in the KS system.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2026.

Builds on

17 of 36 references.

References · 17

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  2. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  3. 2018Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Samplingcited by 323
  4. 2020WeatherBench: A benchmark dataset for data-driven weather forecastingcited by 272
  5. 2022Prioritized Training on Points that are Learnable, Worth Learning, and Not Yet Learntcited by 233
  6. 2022Discovering Invariant Rationales for Graph Neural Networkscited by 186
  7. 2020Integrating Scientific Knowledge with Machine Learning for Engineering and Environmental Systemscited by 160
  8. 2021Delving into Deep Imbalanced Regressioncited by 157
  9. 2022Balanced MSE for Imbalanced Visual Regressioncited by 89
  10. 2015Variance Reduction in SGD by Distributed Importance Samplingcited by 79
  11. 2023Benchmarking Autoregressive Conditional Diffusion Models for Turbulent Flow Simulationcited by 65
  12. 2025PhysicsCorrect: A Training-Free Approach for Stable Neural PDE Simulationscited by 8
5 more
  1. 2025CondensNet: Enabling stable long-term climate simulations via hybrid deep learning models with adaptive physical constraintscited by 5
  2. 2025Dynamical errors in machine learning forecastscited by 5
  3. 2025Differential-Integral Neural Operator for Long-Term Turbulence Forecastingcited by 4
  4. 2024Spatio-temporal Dynamical Indices for Complex Systemscited by 3
  5. 2026Hierarchy of extreme-event predictability in turbulence revealed by machine learningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.