mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Task-Driven 3D Printability Assistance via Geometry- and Knowledge-Grounded LLM Reasoning

arXiv 2608.22128 ↗First posted 22 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Printability assessment in additive manufacturing is typically conducted at the geometry level before printing to determine whether a computer-aided design (CAD) model or stereolithography (STL) file can be successfully fabricated. Task suitability, in contrast, is usually evaluated after printing to determine whether the fabricated part satisfies the requirements of its intended use. As a result, for non-expert users to print functional parts, unsuitable material or process choices may only be identified after fabrication, leading to repeated printing, material waste, and user frustration. To address this challenge, this paper leverages the reasoning and language-understanding capabilities of large language models (LLMs), while grounding the reasoning with geometry evidence and structured material/printer knowledge to generate reliable pre-print recommendations. Given a stereolithography (STL) model and a natural-language task description, the framework generates a structured recommendation covering printability, material choice, process parameters, design guidance, risks, and explanations. We evaluate the framework on focused STL benchmark scenarios with novice-style task descriptions. The proposed method achieves 75.0% printability over 96 physical validation trials, with 88.9% task suitability among successfully printed samples. It also improves Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite material-selection accuracy from 37.5% under pure LLM to 90.0%. Expert evaluation further shows improved report quality, while post-print feedback improves recommendations on selected problematic cases. These results suggest that user task intent, geometry evidence, and structured material knowledge are all important for reliable task-driven printability assistance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 4 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2026.

Builds on

4 of 41 references.

References · 4

  1. 2023Inverse Scaling: When Bigger Isn't Bettercited by 207
  2. 2025LLM-empowered knowledge graph construction: A surveycited by 21
  3. 2026Decision-Aware Uncertainty Evaluation of Vision-Language Model-Based Early Action Anticipation for Human-Robot Interactioncited by 2
  4. 2025Evaluating the printability of stl files with MLcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024LLM-3D Print: Large Language Models To Monitor and Control 3D Printing
  2. 2025In-Context-Learning-Assisted Quality Assessment Vision-Language Models for Metal Additive Manufacturing
  3. 2026AgentsCAD: Automated Design for Manufacturing of FDM Parts via Multi-Agent LLM Reasoning and Geometric Feature Recognition
  4. 2026LLM-ADAM: A Generalizable LLM Agent Framework for Pre-Print Anomaly Detection in Additive Manufacturing
  5. 2025QA-VLM: Providing human-interpretable quality assessment for wire-feed laser additive manufacturing parts with Vision Language Models
  6. 2016Thingi10K: A Dataset of 10,000 3D-Printing Models
  7. 2026Foundation Models for Automatic CAD Generation
  8. 2026Towards Agentic Defect Reasoning: A Graph-Assisted Retrieval Framework for Laser Powder Bed Fusion