Towards Investigating Residual Hearing Loss: Quantification of Fibrosis in a Novel Cochlear OCT Dataset
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Objective: Cochlear implants (CIs) are bionic prostheses that restores hearing via electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. Hybrid CIs, which use electroacoustic stimulation (EAS), combine residual low-frequency acoustic hearing with CI electrical stimulation. Intracochlear fibrosis, which forms in response to the presence of the implant, may impede residual hearing function and gradually reduce the efficacy of EAS. It is therefore a translational objective to study the formation of cochlear fibrosis in rodents, with the goal of reducing fibrotic burden and improving outcomes for CI patients. Methods: We generate and annotate a novel dataset of optical coherence tomography (OCT) images from chronically implanted guinea pigs as part of an ongoing study focused on implant induced fibrosis. Objectively assessing fibrotic burden in this model, with high resolution and repeatability, presents an obvious use case for computer vision methods. Results: We present the results of several state-of-the-art semantic segmentation models and compare their efficacy for identifying cochlear fibrosis and other relevant annotations, using a new library of manually segmented OCT images. Conclusions: We find that the best performance is achieved by using a modified version of the well-known UNET architecture (which we term 2D-OCT-UNET) that operates on the upscaled OCT input resolution. Significance: For the first time, we have successfully applied computer vision techniques to an OCT dataset of implanted cochleae with fibrosis. Using this deep learning model, the cochlear fibrotic burden calculation can be reliably carried out as we verify in our experimental section. The dataset and the project code are available at: https://github.com/juliadietlmeier/CF-OCT-segmentation
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2026.
Builds on
22 of 55 references.
References · 22
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,093
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,656
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,321
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,476
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,195
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,426
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,772
- 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,216
- 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,930
- 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,518
- 2021UNETR: Transformers for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 957
- 2017Generalised Dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentationscited by 615
10 more
- 2019Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysiscited by 173
- 2021Unified Focal loss: Generalising Dice and cross entropy-based losses to handle class imbalanced medical image segmentationcited by 88
- 2022Towards a Guideline for Evaluation Metrics in Medical Image Segmentationcited by 60
- 2023Understanding Imbalanced Semantic Segmentation Through Neural Collapsecited by 46
- 2024How to build the best medical image segmentation algorithm using foundation models: a comprehensive empirical study with Segment Anything Modelcited by 32
- 2020A Survey on Activation Functions and their relation with Xavier and He Normal Initializationcited by 13
- 2021Do We Really Need Dice? The Hidden Region-Size Biases of Segmentation Lossescited by 12
- 2023Narrowing the semantic gaps in U-Net with learnable skip connections: The case of medical image segmentationcited by 9
- 2023Spatial-Frequency U-Net for Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 7
- 2024A Computational Model of the Electrically or Acoustically Evoked Compound Action Potential in Cochlear Implant Users with Residual Hearingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.