Environmental Slow AI: Design Principles for Generative Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative AI (genAI) systems produce cultural artefacts at scale, but they also reflect embedded cultural values through their design. Once identified, these values become open to deliberate reshaping. This position paper examines the maximalist values of current generative AI through an environmental humanities tradition and proposes design principles in which environmental sustainability serves as the core value instead. The principles are developed under the umbrella of Slow AI, a term that already circulates across several distinct research and practice programs. Five design principles are articulated (restraint, sufficiency, selectivity over retention, material visibility, and friction as affordance), each of them illustrated against the current design of widely deployed systems. Each principle operates at two levels: a design implementation, and an interpretive layer at which users and developers are prompted toward reflective engagement with the system. Together these principles extend human agency by restoring decisions that frictionless defaults have silently removed and do so by building interpretive reflection into design.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2026.
Builds on
8 of 37 references.
References · 8
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
- 2019Green AIcited by 627
- 2023Counting Carbon: A Survey of Factors Influencing the Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 42
- 2025From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons' Paradox in AI's Polarized Environmental Debatecited by 23
- 2025More than Carbon: Cradle-to-Grave environmental impacts of GenAI training on the Nvidia A100 GPUcited by 10
- 2025Climate Implications of Diffusion-based Generative Visual AI Systems and their Mass Adoptioncited by 3
- 2026Cognitive Agency Surrender: Defending Epistemic Sovereignty via Scaffolded AI Frictioncited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.