Artificial Intelligence for Workflow Analysis in Colorectal Surgery: A Multicentric, Cross-Procedural Development and Generalization Study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Minimally invasive colorectal surgeries (MIS-CRS) are characterised by significant variability and inconsistent outcomes. ColoWorkflow, a tool for the video-based assessment (VBA) of MIS-CRS workflow, was recently validated. However, manual VBA is time-consuming, limiting implementation. This study presents AI-ColoWorkflow, a deep learning model for automated surgical workflow analysis across MIS-CRS. Operative videos of MIS-CRS were collected from 4 centres and a publicly available dataset. Phases and steps were manually annotated according to ColoWorkflow. A deep learning model combining a fine-tuned DINOv3 vision transformer for per-frame visual feature extraction with a hierarchical multi-stage temporal convolutional network was jointly optimized for phase and step recognition. The model trained on pooled multicentric data, namely AI-ColoWorkflow was compared against centre-specific and procedure-specific models on a held-out test set. The following metrics were used for evaluation: macro F1 score, balanced accuracy, precision, and recall. AI-ColoWorkflow achieved a macro F1 of 73.01% ± 10.27 (balanced accuracy 73.43%) for phase recognition and 39.82% ± 7.06 (balanced accuracy 38.65%) for step recognition. The global model outperformed centre- and procedure-specific models in most experiments except procedure-specific step recognition. In the generalization analysis, mean F1 was 48.42% for phase recognition. AI-ColoWorkflow can reliably recognize MIS-CRS phases. A single model trained on pooled, multicentric, multi-procedural data generalises at least as well as and often better than centre- or procedure-specific models for phase recognition in MIS-CRS, while procedure-specific step models retain advantages for certain procedure types, motivating hybrid training strategies for future surgical AI development.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2026.
Builds on
11 of 25 references.
References · 11
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2021Comparative Validation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Surgical Workflow and Skill Analysis with the HeiChole Benchmarkcited by 60
- 2023LoViT: Long Video Transformer for Surgical Phase Recognitioncited by 56
- 2020Heidelberg Colorectal Data Set for Surgical Data Science in the Sensor Operating Roomcited by 47
- 2021Multi-Task Temporal Convolutional Networks for Joint Recognition of Surgical Phases and Steps in Gastric Bypass Procedurescited by 42
- 2024HecVL: Hierarchical Video-Language Pretraining for Zero-shot Surgical Phase Recognitioncited by 42
- 2023Challenges in Multi-centric Generalization: Phase and Step Recognition in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgerycited by 40
- 2021Exploring Segment-level Semantics for Online Phase Recognition from Surgical Videoscited by 23
- 2023MOSaiC: a Web-based Platform for Collaborative Medical Video Assessment and Annotationcited by 11
- 2025Endoshare: A Publicly Available, Surgeons-Friendly Solution to De-Identify and Manage Surgical Videoscited by 2
- 2026GEN-Guard: Correcting Generalization Failures for Deployable Federated Surgical AIcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.