Forking Fast: Efficiently Estimating Uncertainty Dynamics in Text Generation
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
LLM reasoning is stochastic, and so understanding a model requires grappling with the distribution of reasoning chains that it might produce for a given question, i.e., its uncertainty. Resampling-based analyses characterize this distribution, revealing which steps of a rollout determine how the model arrives at its answer. However, a major limitation of these approaches is that resampling text sequences at every token or sentence in a reasoning chain is very costly. Our work strives to make resampling analysis more computationally efficient, while also shedding light on an important scientific question: what is the right statistical model for explaining uncertainty dynamics in text generation? We show that when resampling many reasoning chains, uncertainty dynamics converge to stable patterns, and noise is largely an artifact of sampling rather than an LLM's sensitivity to each individual token or reasoning step. We develop a statistical model for smoothing noisy low-sample rollout data to better approximate high-sample data, allowing us to significantly cut sampling costs.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 10 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2026.
Builds on
10 of 15 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 9
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 822
- 2024tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examplescited by 295
- 2025Thought Anchors: Which LLM Reasoning Steps Matter?cited by 126
- 2026Reasoning Theater: Disentangling Model Beliefs from Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 35
- 2024Forking Paths in Neural Text Generationcited by 30
- 2023In-Context Learning Dynamics with Random Binary Sequencescited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Reasoning Under Uncertainty: Exploring Probabilistic Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs
- 2026Evaluating LLM Uncertainty in Long-Form Generation Using Deterministic Ground Truth
- 2026The Origins of Stochasticity: Comprehensive Investigations on Uncertainty Quantification for Large Language Models
- 2026Probability is Not Enough: Exploring and Counting Divergent Tokens for Reasoning Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs
- 2026Answer-Distribution Trajectories: A Stochastic-Dynamics View of LLM Reasoning
- 2026Statistical Early Stopping for Reasoning Models
- 2025Measuring Reasoning Utility in LLMs via Conditional Entropy Reduction
- 2026EDIS: Diagnosing LLM Reasoning via Entropy Dynamics