The Evaluation Context Protocol (ECP): A Portable Contract for AI Agent Evaluation
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
The evolution of artificial intelligence has necessitated a fundamental shift from evaluating isolated Large Language Models (LLMs) to assessing autonomous agentic architectures. This paper explores the critical methodologies for evaluating AI agents and the essential role of advanced observability infrastructure. We analyze the architectural components of agents and identify the severe limitations of current evaluation paradigms, including benchmark exploitation, the "confidently wrong" phenomenon, and the discrepancy between theoretical capability and operational reliability. To begin addressing the fragmentation in current evaluation infrastructure, this paper proposes the Evaluation Context Protocol (ECP), an early-stage, vendor-neutral framework intended to act as a portable evaluation contract layer for agentic systems. In its current form ECP defines a small JSON-RPC interface over which an agent exposes its user-visible output, the tool calls it made, and evaluator-safe audit context, and against which programmatic checks can be run uniformly across frameworks and continuous integration systems. We describe an open-source reference implementation that includes adapters for LangChain, LlamaIndex, CrewAI, and PydanticAI, and we situate the design against failure modes documented in the recent literature. ECP is presented as work in progress rather than a finished standard: the evaluation surface, method set, and grader families are all expected to change as the protocol is exercised against more systems, and the empirical validation required to justify adoption is outlined as future work.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 2 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2026.
Builds on
2 of 17 references.
References · 2
- 2024AI Agents That Mattercited by 199
- 2026MAESTRO: Multi-Agent Evaluation Suite for Testing, Reliability, and Observabilitycited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025MCP-AgentBench: Evaluating Real-World Language Agent Performance with MCP-Mediated Tools
- 2026AgentCompass: A Unified Evaluation Infrastructure for Agent Capabilities
- 2026AI Agents Do Not Fail Alone:The Context Fails First
- 2025MCPEval: Automatic MCP-based Deep Evaluation for AI Agent Models
- 2026AgentAudit: An Open, Extensible Framework for Full-Lifecycle Trust Evaluation of AI Agents
- 2026Agent-as-a-Judge
- 2026Towards More Standardized AI Evaluation: From Models to Agents
- 2026AEMA: Verifiable Evaluation Framework for Trustworthy and Controlled Agentic LLM Systems