CDGP: Contrastive Dual Gaussian Processes for Weakly Supervised Anomaly Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Industrial visual inspection must both decide whether a product is defective and localize the defect, yet pixel-level masks are costly to collect at scale. Most anomaly-segmentation methods learn only from defect-free images and score deviations from normality. A true defect and an unusual-but-normal region, however, can both deviate substantially and receive similarly high scores. We propose Contrastive Dual Gaussian Processes (CDGP), a weakly supervised framework that models normal and anomaly inducing-variable predictive distributions over dense tokens. Its posterior-dominance statistic standardizes their predictive-mean difference by the joint predictive uncertainty, providing both spatial evidence and image-level confidence. This evidence complements hierarchical normal-reconstruction residuals for fine localization. All calibration uses training data only, without human pixel annotations or test-time fitting. Across MVTec AD~2, KSDD2, and VisA, CDGP ranks first among the evaluated methods on all MVTec AD~2 localization metrics and is first-place or competitive on KSDD2 and VisA. Factorized and matched linear-head controls delimit the contribution and scope of the linear-kernel Gaussian process (GP) formulation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2026.
Builds on
15 of 19 references.
References · 15
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
- 2021Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 776
- 2020PaDiM: a Patch Distribution Modeling Framework for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 594
- 2021DRAEM -- A discriminatively trained reconstruction embedding for surface anomaly detectioncited by 514
- 2015Deep Kernel Learningcited by 445
- 2022Anomaly Detection via Reverse Distillation from One-Class Embeddingcited by 421
- 2022SPot-the-Difference Self-Supervised Pre-training for Anomaly Detection and Segmentationcited by 400
- 2023EfficientAD: Accurate Visual Anomaly Detection at Millisecond-Level Latenciescited by 160
- 2022Multi-class Token Transformer for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 138
- 2021Mixed supervision for surface-defect detection: from weakly to fully supervised learningcited by 101
Built on by
Not cited yet.